Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Diamond Jim who wrote (131201)	3/29/2001 2:07:24 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Jim, re: So that means that some eyes would not see Clintons cigar trick as immoral? some would think it was okay to take White House furniture, some would okay his lying to America, some would okay his selling of pardons? Obviously that's correct, some people would say all those things. Or some would say that what Nixon did was far worse, some would say that President Bush's actions against the environment since taking office were worse. Many would say that Jack Kennedy's sexual antics were worse. But if you are asking about relative immorality, I would say our Vietnam adventure would rank as the low point of our recent political morality. Others would say that it was a very honorable period in our history. Everything depends on your perspective when you are talking about morality and politics. That's why I think it's a dead end discussion. John