SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (87944)3/30/2001 11:52:41 AM
From: 200ma  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
I would think uranium would be more attractive as an alternative fuel, since it's less of a pollutant for the environment



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (87944)3/30/2001 12:33:28 PM
From: yard_man  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
keep in mind that >80% of coal production is tied up in long-term contracts -- not exposed to spot -- this is largely overspill from the economics of the spike in the price of NG, resultant draw down of coal stockpiles, etc.

I won't call some of those intermediate NG plants "malinvestments" yet ...

This will disproportionately hit the smaller players first.

Could be really serious if it persists more than 3 - 5 years


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News