SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : High Tolerance Plasticity -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: BigBull who wrote (2648)3/31/2001 2:16:10 PM
From: chowder  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 23153
 
>> Confident consumers could be the factor that rescues the US economy from sliding into an economic recession according to earlier statements by the Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan. <<

Next week the earnings reports will start coming out for the technology companies. I wonder what will happen to consumer confidence when they start seeing that these companies are losing more money than was predicted and the "lack of visibility" now extends well into 2002?

My problem with these consumer confidence number surveys is that they were taken after the January effect. Hell, I like to think I keep up with the market, and I wasn't short a single stock in January and I spit at stocks in my portfolio
that didn't rise 20% or more.

These last couple of weeks, most of my gains were made by going short. With the exception of DDS, my long positions were all short term trades and if they weren't, they would have all given back their gains, or damn near close to it.

>> the savings rate was still a negative 1.3%, showing that consumers are still spending more than their income - and building up debts <<

They're not spending now, at least not as much as they have been. I spoke with an asst. store manager of one of our large department stores and she said there wasn't a single department within the store running an increase over last month's figures. According to my unscientific survey, this doesn't bode well for future consumer confidence surveys.

And what ever happened to, "don't fight the FED?" Shorting the FED seems to have netted more profits than counting on them.

And, how bout this? >> The capital spending of the past several years isn't coming back for a while. Good companies are not just going to blow away, but we all need to start looking at reasonable growth rates and numbers - which can still come down even more. Two key points: Let's take the storage industry for example. I'm now hearing from customers that 5-15% of storage spending is discretionary, versus the long-held belief that storage spending was non-discretionary. So let's take the middle-ground of about 10%. Now knock another 10% off the group's earnings numbers. Yeah…ugly, huh? Lastly, do you know who CSCO's new competition is? It's CSCO's own customers! It's the dot.com's that have gone out of business in record time that are now selling their networking products (only 9 months old) to all of CSCO's customers. Ugly, huh?

... source: Julia Casals is the Director of Business Development and David Zusman, CFA is a Portfolio Manager at Pergament Advisors, LLC, a money management firm located in New York. <<

What happens to INTC if they don't follow through with their large capital spending program? They are losing market share to AMD. Their margins are getting squeezed, from what I understand, by AMD and others competing against them. If I recall correctly, it was INTC's announcement during their last earnings report that they planned on a large capex spending program going forward that saved their share price from falling further. I'm short INTC.

According to Gottfried's post, an article in the Mercury News seems to think the future doesn't look to bright for the chips.

>> Brace yourself, Silicon Valley: The outlook for the chip industry is getting worse.

For the first time in 16 years, many analysts are predicting that the number of semiconductors sold worldwide in 2001 will drop -- a startling notion because computer chips are now found in everything from personal computers to cars. <<

My recommendation? Craw down into the belly of the Hunley and wait for the storm to pass over. <vbg>

KREM has finally started to give up some of its profits ahead of the stock release program next week. I'm a holdin on! I don't know how this ride is going to turn out, but it sure is going to be interesting.

On a bright sunny afternoon, with Puccini blaring in the background, and from the "short" side, Nessum Dorm'maaaaa! Can I sing or what?

dabum



To: BigBull who wrote (2648)4/1/2001 12:58:25 PM
From: Razorbak  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 23153
 
"Market Watch: Micron's Bulls, Defying the Bubble"

April 1, 2001

By GRETCHEN MORGENSON
The sound of technology stock bubbles bursting has become all too familiar in recent months. Snap went the Internet stocks early last year. Crack went the shares of personal computer makers in the autumn. Pop went the big networking stocks this winter.

All that makes it triply amazing that Micron Technology, one of the market's most ethereal stocks, remains at celestial heights.

Back on earth, Micron Technology is a commodity producer of semiconductors and memory products that run personal computers and other gadgets. Last Thursday, Micron announced woeful results for its second quarter, which ended March 1.

But all seems right in the heavens, for despite its crummy numbers, an overall depression in the PC business and deep uncertainty among other technology executives about future demand for their products, Micron's shares are 17 percent higher than they were at the beginning of the year.

How bad were Micron's numbers? Sales in its second quarter were $1.06 billion, down 42 percent from just three months earlier. The company's gross margins cascaded from 49 percent in its first quarter to 18 percent in its second. Continuing operations at Micron generated a $4 million loss in the latest quarter, versus $359 million earned in the previous one.

Investors weren't thrilled with these results, even though a handful of Wall Street analysts remain inexplicably high on Micron shares. The stock fell 11.6 percent on Friday, closing at $41.53.

At that price, the company's market capitalization exceeds $24 billion. Its shares trade at a stunning 5.6 times sales, if you extrapolate out from its second-quarter results.

Investors have made Micron the third-most-valuable semiconductor stock in the United States, behind Texas Instruments and Intel. Yet Intel is down 12.5 percent this year and Texas Instruments has lost 35 percent of its value.

Fred Hickey, editor of the High Tech Strategist in Nashua, N.H., says Micron is more cult than stock, because traders like its volatility. "It's the best barometer we have of the love affair still going on among investors in technology stocks," he said. Many dot-coms are dead, he added, "but Micron is there, standing tall at $24 billion on the hope that some day the DRAM market will pick up."

Mr. Hickey, who has followed technology stocks for more than 20 years, pointed out that in previous periods when Micron's operations were losing money, or barely making any, its stock traded at much lower valuations.

In 1998, Micron lost money and its shares traded at roughly 1.3 times its sales. And in 1992, when the company broke even, the stock traded at a price equal to its sales.

Mr. Hickey thinks that Micron and other semiconductor stocks have remained high — even as shares of their customers have plummeted — because the performance of chip makers' operations lags behind that of PC makers, Internet service providers and networking concerns. "Semiconductors are the last great bubble area of technology," Mr. Hickey said. "Because earnings have held up better there, investors stay in the stocks, even though that is where the collapse will be the greatest."

Investors may also be bullish on semiconductor stocks because they expect memory prices to rise. That seems unlikely, given inventory levels. At Micron, inventories stood at $1.1 billion in the most recent quarter, up from $690 million last August. Using the company's average selling price, investors can guess how many chips that $1.1 billion represents. A rough estimate is that Micron could supply about 25 percent of the world's annual PC needs with the chips it has on hand. It produces an additional 70 million parts a month.

Micron may not have much of a business these days. But its stubbornly loyal investors are making sure that it remains one hell of a stock.


nytimes.com



To: BigBull who wrote (2648)4/1/2001 11:01:59 PM
From: JungleInvestor  Respond to of 23153
 
Big Bull, Re:
<The preliminary Purchasing Managers Index from the Chicago region fell to 35 in March compared to 43.2 in February.

Any figure below 50 indicates a contraction.

It was the collapse of business confidence in December that first alerted the Fed to the US slowdown.

"(It) goes to show the manufacturing sector is still mired in recession while consumer spending is still holding up. The only hope for the economy right now is that that consumer spending will get stronger and help pull the manufacturing sector out of the funk that it is in," said Mitch Stapley of Kent Funds. >
----------

The recession of the manufacturing sector and corresponding layoffs are, by definition, going to pull the consumer confidence down. The service sector is a much bigger slice of the pie now than it was during the last recession and it hasn't felt a downturn yet which is probably causing a lag in consumer confidence. The manufacturing downturn and layoffs, however, are going to impact the service sector, it just hasn't happened significantly yet.

Friday may have been the resumption of the oilpatch's spring rally. Energy companies' earnings should be great, as opposed to just about everything else in the investment universe. Earnings could be the catalyst to jumpstart the patch.



To: BigBull who wrote (2648)4/13/2001 6:42:18 PM
From: Razorbak  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 23153
 
"Weekly Insider Review 4/11/01"

Subscribers to our $49.95/year Member Services get this commentary on Mondays.

Last week there were 220 companies that had insiders file Form 4s with the SEC indicating purchases, and 208 indicating sales. This is a relatively bullish ratio that will help the Rolling 4-Week Average on our Insider-Based Market Indicator look a bit more optimistic. But we are hardly ready to pound the table and scream for investors to jump back into the market with both feet.

This week will be the high filing time for insiders to send their Form 4s into the SEC telling us how they acted during last month's nasty sell off. It would be great to see a large percentage more companies with insiders buying than selling, but it would have to be an immensely lopsided ratio to make us feel confidently bullish.

Over the past couple of years, a warm bullish feeling has been justified when the Rolling 4-Week Indicator has breached the mark where 50% more companies have insiders buying than selling. But just reaching this point hasn't always been the best time to sell the house and kids and buy, buy, buy.

In the Fall of 1998, for instance, the market continued down after that 50% point was passed. The indicators became progressively more bullish during that market slide, of course, and this indicated that insiders saw tremendous values in the declining shares of their companies. Correctly, as it turned out. But the fact remains that the direction of the indicators must be taken into account as well as their absolute levels.

The way we intend to use the recent behavior of our indicators is to increase the flow of money back into the market as the indicator breaches the bullish, 50% mark, but not jump in with both feet. Calling the absolute bottom of this decline is a sucker's game, and we would rather miss some upside than be bloodied further.

So, as of now, our Buy List has the fewest number of positions on it since we began offering our research in 1997. Users should read this as us being primarily in cash, waiting for our indicators to tell us the worst is over. Many of the stocks we have recently been stopped out of will likely make it back on our Buy List when the market does improve, but we are happy to take a breather on the sidelines for now. Below are stocks that had interesting insider buying activity last week. These could also make it on our Buy List in the future.

Lands End (Nyse: LE) $27.00
Retailing has been a difficult sector to analyze in recent years. Consumer spending has been quite robust, but the explosion of e-tailer web sites caused unexpected competition for the traditional players.

Lands End (NYSE: LE), which itself turned retailing on its head through the advent of its catalog business, was hit especially hard by the Internet upstarts. The company, which earned $2.00 a share in Fiscal (January) 1998, earned just $1.13 a share in Fiscal 2001. Sales didn't actually fall over that time, but heavy competition from e-tailers led to profit-sapping price wars.

That has brought the company's stock down from $80 in late 1999 to a recent $27.

But a turn looks to be at hand as management has taken a series of steps to boost profits over the next few years. And with e-tailers now heading for the exits, they'll be able to revamp the business with fewer competitive threats.

Lands End's woes stemmed, in part, from poor merchandising. That strongly impacted both gross and operating profit margins. In addition, the company mismanaged its mailing strategies. But as CSFB's Richard Baum notes, the company is now making "excellent progress in merchandising its core business, circulation strategies and infrastructure enhancements." The analyst, who rates the stock a Hold, adds that "although operating margins are still well below peak levels, implying significant upside to earnings, sustained stock outperformance is only likely once the company can demonstrate a more consistent record of earnings growth."

Barrington Research's Derek Leckow is more sanguine. His recent report titled "Back to Sustainable Sales and Earnings Growth" highlights several metrics that imply a strong turnaround. For example, he thinks that profits can grow 20% a year for this year and next-even if sales only grow by a few percentage points. He now figures the stock is poised to rise thanks to its upper-teen earnings multiple. Insiders agree, as a pair of them recently snapped up more than $1.2 million in stock on the open market.

Popular, Inc. (Nyse: BPOP) $28.75
We recently devoted a special section to regional banks. We noted a conspicuous increase in insider buying, which reminded us of a very lucrative sector play several years back. We still remain quite enamored of the sector, and especially like Popular, Inc. (Nasdaq: BPOP), which is also a play on the booming Hispanic sector.

As the recent census showed, Hispanics are becoming a major demographic force in the U.S. Hispanics numbered 22.4 million in 1990, accounting for 9% of the population. That number grew 58% during the ensuing decade to 35.3 million. Hispanics now account for roughly 13% of the population.

Popular controls 30% of the Puerto Rican banking market. But with many families spread across the map, the bank realized that it can readily serve new customers now residing in the States. As a result, Popular now has branches in six states: New York (32 branches), Illinois (21), California (16), New jersey (12), Florida (10), and Texas (5). Florida is especially noteworthy as the company has just entered the potentially large Miami market.

Shares of Popular reached $35 a few years back, thanks to the expected demographic boost. A weakening U.S. economy caused the stock to slump to $20 before a recent rebound to $28. Though the stocks now trades in line with the multiples accorded to most bank stocks, and credit quality is lackluster, investors may want to get into the stock before the next sector rally. The company's chairman and three directors already have, snapping up $900,000 worth of stock in March.

Steris Corp. (Nyse: STE) $13.50
Flat hospital spending on equipment and supplies wrecked a number of business models. A host of suppliers built out their business infrastructure in anticipation of 10-15% spending hikes in 1999 and 2000. When the growth failed to materialize, many operators were stuck with bloated expense structures that drained profits.

Steris Corp (NYSE: STE), which is the leading provider of sterilization products and services, was especially vulnerable. Sales in Fiscal (March) 2000 actually fell five percent, and per share profits sank from $1.20 a share in Fiscal 1999 to just $0.15.

As a result, shares went into freefall over the last few years. And a recent warnings that restructurings would cause further profit woes for the first half of calendar 2001 sent shares of Steris even lower. That brought formerly bearish analysts out of the woodwork, and several quickly upgraded their ratings on the stock. Salomon Smith Barney's Anne Malone was one of the upgraders on March 16, noting that "with two messy years and restructurings largely behind it, Steris is now poised to benefit from an upturn in hospital spending." She added that "new management is taking valiant steps to clean up the mess." Malone figures the stock as about 15 times calendar 2002 earnings, sells at a "noticeable discount to the med-tech group."

UBS Warburg's Charles Olsziewki has also been impressed with the efforts of new management. "The secular bottom-line growth that management is forecasting is quite a bit more robust than we believed possible," he writes. Importantly, management guidance doesn't count on strong top line growth. Instead, massive headcount reductions, coupled with other cost-saving measures should provide the bulk of the profit growth.

Insiders must be confident in their ability to effect a turnaround. The company's CEO and Treasurer recently picked up a collective $140,000 of stock.


insidertrader.com



To: BigBull who wrote (2648)4/25/2001 3:40:45 PM
From: Terry D  Respond to of 23153
 
BB -

Koizumi -

No one has the answers, but where would you put his chances?
Can he privatize the postal savings system or push through fiscal and corporate reforms that have immediate pain and long term gain?
Will he have the power to overcome the L.D.P. old guard?
Is this a withering away of an established order - a restructuring of the magnitude of Perestroika?
What is with the hair? Is he the fifth Beatle?

t
d