Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Little Joe who wrote (134416)	4/1/2001 12:08:49 AM
From: greenspirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Little Joe, someone may be able to find 20. Although I've never seen anyone do it. But I guarantee you they will not find 19,200 scientist in America which support the Kyoto protocols based on the science of climatology. I couldn't disagree with you more in regard to your characterization that these scientists are pimps for signing the petition. I can't think of another major issue, Big Media has been so one-sided in presenting the information about then Global Warming. The fact that 19,200 of our nations scientists (many with specific knowledge in the area of climatology) are willing to go on the record and make such a statement. Should have made page one news in the NY Times many months ago. I would consider it a great moral outrage if our nation went down a radical path, such as the Kyoto Protocol mandates, if our leading scientists believed this way, and never said anything publicly. Further, I don't see the comparison of this issue and "gay genes" as being valid. Cultural issues are one thing to discuss and debate, but in this case, we're talking about a hard science. Gay genes may or may not sway our cultural attitudes one way or another. But knowledge about the effects of CO2 on the earth's climate certainly would.

To: Little Joe who wrote (134416)	4/1/2001 3:11:10 AM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 769667

Dear little joe, democrats used a polictical scientist to spout the polictical science of an absurd theory of a voting machine problem. In my opinion if your understanding of science is at the same level as three year old and you cannot for yourself understand the logic and rational of the information posted by Michael your calling scientist pimps expose to all what a sick judgemental ass you are. You are as honest as mr bill and just as technically stupid. I have no idea what the gay gene issue is and you are clueless as to the energy level and frequency range of a cell phone. By the way the energy from a hundred watt light bulb is the same as that from a cell phone. It's all electromagnetic energy. If you want to see what I use for reference. well the upper right hand corner has a clue. watman.com And the four eyes in this image on you computer screen will be sending electromagnetic energy onto the retina's of an idiot who pimps for the whores of snake oil science. tom watson tosiwmee