Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: robwin who wrote (35130)	4/1/2001 1:22:59 AM
From: abuelita	Respond to of 35685

Holy cow Rob, I didn't know that!

To: robwin who wrote (35130)	4/1/2001 7:00:29 AM
From: AllansAlias	Respond to of 35685

robwin, I am not a lawyer so I look at this with the eyes of layman. I do not see how the man could be sued, nor do I think he should be sued for giving his investment advice. I have absolutely no interest in this beyond the theoretical. So, can you explain to a layman in a few sentences how such a suit is credible? Can we use the situation where Joe X offers free advice and Jim X acts on said advice?

To: robwin who wrote (35130)	4/1/2001 9:37:28 AM
From: average joe	Respond to of 35685

You're all nuts! If you lost money investing on his say so just think how much money he lost. The only winner here is the lawyer who is encouraging you to proceed. Instead of a market call you will have a lawyer making a cash call for an account that will never turn a profit. Lick your wounds and be happy for the valuable lesson in investing that you now have called experience. Bunch of babies!!