Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (134451)	4/1/2001 11:20:42 AM
From: RON BL	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769667

People in the suburbs do want less arsenic in their drinking water So why didn't Bill Clinton do something about it ? Why did he wait for the last moment ? Was it because he knew the cost of implementing this was extremely high and that there was no problem ? Was it because he would want to inflict all kinds of hardships on a new administration like the energy problems he left this country ? Maybe he wants 1$ a gallon for water. HE was in office for 8 years and did nothing except take credit for the work that Silicon Valley did and raise money. That's all. Opps I forgot he disgraced the White House and put gays in the military

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (134451)	4/1/2001 12:34:05 PM
From: CYBERKEN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

I have a hard time believing that these suburbanites are willing to buy the Left/Media line whole when the reasonable side is presented. It's possible that Republicans will have to speak more to the issue at election time instead of falling into media-dictated formulas. But that's the real job of political leadership and the Republicans are just starting to figure that out again. Just as the Clinton tax recession is now emerging to alter the stale economic debate, the prospect of these suburbanites suffering from brown outs, blackouts and tripling of power bills before the 2002 election offers a chance for the more worthy politicians in their areas to copy George Bush in making the common sense case against environmental fraud. We shall see if the Republicans have what it takes...

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (134451)	4/1/2001 12:49:38 PM
From: KLP	Respond to of 769667

Kenneth...do you have a link for that? And it is odd that if Gore carried this district on the environment alone...that Nadar wouldn't have carried it instead. Also, to say that Bush has "right wing extremist views on environmental protection" is laughable....What do you think those so called "rwe" views are?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (134451)	4/1/2001 12:53:53 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 769667

Dear Kenneth, have you heard that because of a lack of rains up in the pacific north west that the snow pack is only 60% of normal. Am I wrong but does the snow pack melt and the water created run down rivers and generate electricity. Hmmmm. so this summer when all those fruits and nuts in the california state turn on the air conditioners and the light go out, I think that the folks up north will see the consequences of the technically retarded green bean coalition. I'd suggest you study boortz I believe the red will swallow a lot of the blue flu. But as we all know vacant liberal minds are free to fantasize about whatever the wish. That's because America is great. tom watson tosiwmee