Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Webster Groves who wrote (73863)	4/2/2001 3:00:02 PM
From: ahhaha	Respond to of 99985

What ad hominem argument? I stated earlier why special relativity effects on mass change are apparent. For example, an accelerated proton increases in electromagnetic mass, but its rest mass does not change. We impute a mass increase which is well determined by the Lorentz Dirac equation, but in order to slow it down, we find that the added "mass" is lost, radiated or decayed away, and that its mass returns to its original rest value. The special relativity point mentioned earlier is that we have to put more electromagnetic energy into the proton to accelerate it up to its velocity than what we would expect under purely Newtoninan or Galilaean considerations. I am not interested in what you think "real physicists" say. If any of them wish to disagree with anything I've said, I'm all ears. You won't find any of them doing that. You will only find overblown engineers trying to obfuscate the original topic.