SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (134719)4/2/2001 4:28:13 PM
From: Kevin Rose  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
When I cut and paste, some of the charts lost some formatting, and could be confusing. I'll try to reillustrate here:

Handgun 1992 Handgun Percent Overall
Murder Handgun Murder
Country Murders Pop Rate Ownership Rate
(per 100k) (per 100K)
-----------------------------------------------------------
United States 13,429 254m 5.28 29% 8.4
Switzerland 97 6m 1.42 14% 2.25
Canada 128 27m 0.47 5% 5.45
Sweden 36 8.7m 0.42 <1% 1.73
Australia 13 18mm 0.07 2% 4.48
United Kingdom 33 57.8m 0.06 1% 1.97
Japan 60 124m 0.05 <1% 1.20

EDITORS NOTE - WHEN I EDIT THIS IN THE REPLY EDIT MODE, IT LINES UP. WHEN I GO TO POST IT, IT UNFORMATS IT AGAIN. SORRY.

Though not straight line, the numbers show a definite correlation between handgun ownership and murder rates. In Japan, there were 60 murders; in the US, 13,429 (223x) The handgun rate for Japan did not show up on the charts; I put <1%, how close to zero is anyone's guess.

On the other, I'm not sure what your issue with the motives are? Also, I can't see where you are talking about the 'missing 40%'; is it this chart?:

Circumstances 1993
---------------------
Argument 30.8%
Unknown 27.7
Other Motives 21.7
Felonies 19.1