To: Ally who wrote (49095 ) 4/2/2001 6:15:27 PM From: parker_meridian Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 62347 You really should give this up before you look even more foolish. Lets see, last week you argued that no one in Canada can transact short sales online(even lola knew!), and that there was some undefined strange margin requirements to short otherwise. Today you post "realtime trades" including short BVF. When it's pointed out that only a single seller sold at the price you claimed, you tried to make out that you were in fact using Morgan Stanley(on the heels of last weeks "commission at full service brokers was too high to trade with")...despite the fact there was no possible cover at the price you claimed by morgan stanley. In some weird attempt to cover this gaff, you comeout with the fact you have a "prez" account(as if this allows you to make trades that aren't on the tape?), something even most of the one lotters here must have laughed at, with the very minimal account activity required to achieve such lofty status. Despite the evidence your trade wasn't real, you dig at others that you were making money while they weren't. You try to come across as some expert, but your posting history shows in the past few months you talked of taking a trading course from an online guru, and were concerned about the cost of upgrading you pentium 1 with very inadequate memory. Your numerous calls on "funamentals" don't show any particular astuteness either (Geac ROFL) . You're so concerned about how I post, yet you read every single post I write, and respond to most of them...even though ignore is only a click away and you have a new thread where the make a dime lose a dollar crowd can happily post away. Clearly you aren't up to the task of jousting with us...so why bother? Before I get blamed for the thread today...let it be noted it was a simple link to an article on trading rules that got ally started posting here today.