Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JeanD who wrote (42067)	4/2/2001 4:47:56 PM
From: Ian McGuire	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 49816

you're just a news machine tonight jeannie!

To: JeanD who wrote (42067)	4/2/2001 4:51:33 PM
From: Bald Man from Mars	Respond to of 49816

If you asked me last year when we were at 5000 that what we would be in March 2001, and if you told me that it would be at 1800, I would have check you into a mental hospital, now I am the one who is going to check in, but I heard the waiting line in too long and they are all Nasdaq long players ...

To: JeanD who wrote (42067)	4/2/2001 5:02:06 PM
From: Joe Hoek	Respond to of 49816

Thanks Jean - well it popped for a bit there and seems to be holding 12 (up 1/2 AH) while everything else seems to be negative AH. Was wondering why it was under such pressure the past few days, but on light volume compared to the average. So 38-41 Mil 1Q. Last Q revs were $33.9 million compared with $6.8 million in the year-ago period and $43 million for 4Q 2000. They raised full year from $150 to 240, then back down to what $170? They would've been a lot better off not changing anything and then surprising everyone. Oh well - maybe this one might be worth buying now... Keeping an eye on CIEN - didn't get it on Friday below 40 due to the power outage here, but looking for pullbacks or confirmation it's found somewhat of a bottom. Let's see what the SOX and NAZ does..