SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : JDS Uniphase (JDSU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Frank Ellis Morris who wrote (19930)4/2/2001 8:21:03 PM
From: puborectalis  Respond to of 24042
 
How can AG allow the technology sector to be impaled...you think the Walmarts of the world are leading us into the next millenium?...every day we see the recession in mfg deepen....the cost of borrowing is still too damn HIGH!



To: Frank Ellis Morris who wrote (19930)4/2/2001 8:33:39 PM
From: puborectalis  Respond to of 24042
 
Broadband company Rhythms NetConnections is considering putting itself up for sale amid a delisting notice from the Nasdaq and a question from its auditors on whether it has enough cash to continue operating. The stock lost 13 cents to finish at 31 cents.



To: Frank Ellis Morris who wrote (19930)4/2/2001 8:46:42 PM
From: puborectalis  Respond to of 24042
 
The whole tech world is crumbling and AG sits idly by in his ivory tower......AOL next to crumble......AOL Time Warner staff fretting

Company denies talk of more layoffs, but sources close to media giant say employees bracing for pink slips

By Elliot Zaret and Jane Weaver
MSNBC

April 2 — AOL Time Warner employees are bracing for a second round of layoffs amid rising tensions and executive infighting within the company, sources close to the media giant said. While the company denies rumors of additional layoffs, sources say the atmosphere within AOL Time Warner is one of tension and uncertainty.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW




Advertisements





ACCORDING TO THE SOURCES, AOL Time Warner wants to prove it can meet its financial targets for 2001 and will make up the shortfall from poor advertising sales with additional job cuts.
AOL Time Warner spokesman Ed Adler denied that executives and managers were feuding. Asked about the possibility of additional layoffs, Adler simply denied all rumors.

Sources told MSNBC.com that turf wars and executive infighting have been casting a pall on promises of "teamwork and camaraderie" in the newly combined company.

Any additional layoffs would follow the 2,400 employees who were given pink slips in January, shortly after the AOL-Time Warner merger was finalized.

TENSE WORK ENVIRONMENT
Since the merger, the work environment inside the company has become increasingly tense, the sources said. The January layoffs were swift and painful, with employees told to clear off their desks and leave immediately, and that their company e-mail accounts would be shut off by 8 p.m.

The possible additional layoffs come amid a dramatic slowdown in advertising across all media. Although AOL Time Warner has been thought to be more protected against a pullback in ad spending because of its revenues from subscription fees and its ability to sell cross-platform deals with major clients, some analysts have become wary about the media giant's ambitious 2001 operating earnings target of $11 billion.

As a result, the AOL Time Warner ad-sales force has been particularly aggressive, in one case pitching an advertising client to increase the amount of money it spends with the online service from less than $1 million a year to over $50 million over the next 5 years, according to one ad agency executive.

Meanwhile, executives and managers — thrust together from Time Warner, Turner, AOL, and all the other myriad properties — have been fighting turf wars, trying to carve out their chunk of the new company, sources close to the company said. Those sources said the biggest turf wars have involved Turner executives, who have faced the biggest departmental cuts.

The result has been a political minefield in the company that has many employees throughout the empire on edge, the sources said.

Even before the merger closed, AOL's Steve Case acknowledged widespread rumors about personality and power clashes between AOL and Time Warner executives. During a presentation at the UBS Warburg media conference in December, Case claimed that executives were setting aside their egos in the broader strategic spirit of "teamwork and camaraderie."

"You'll find it'll work remarkably well," he predicted.

But evidence mounts that the team spirit is fading, the sources said.

Last month, Richard Bressler, who was responsible for negotiating the merger with AOL, was fired after a verbal altercation with Case, the sources said. Bressler, who had been Time Warner CFO and a close friend of AOL Time Warner CEO Gerald Levin, has gone to rival Viacom after being asked to leave AOL Time Warner.

Bressler's departure could be the first salvo in a bloody battle where AOL takes over most areas of the far-flung empire. Time Warner managers have been positioning themselves so that they won't share Bressler's fate.


AOL Time WarnerCitigroup

• Message Board

• Company Profile

• Earnings Estimates

• Analyst Reports





The Warner Music Group is especially mired in the political turf wars, as many in the company feel it is more vulnerable to change, the sources said. Although it's unclear whether AOL Music has oversight of Warner Music, in January AOL brought in veteran music industry executive Kevin Conroy from BMG, a subsidiary of rival Bertelsmann, to head up its digital music efforts and industry observers expect him to bring in other BMG executives.

Similarly, company reaction to a recent MSNBC.com report that AOL Time Warner plans to launch a cable music channel that would compete with MTV and VH1 also shines light on fractures in the empire's foundation.

AOL Time Warner spokespeople were completely mum on the report, sticking to an official "no comment."

But a spokesperson for Turner Broadcasting Group CEO Jamie Kellner — who is slated to run the new channel — denied the channel's existence. "That's not being considered," Brad Turell, a spokesman for Kellner, told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. "There's nothing we are working on. Nothing Jamie is working on. There is nothing ready to go."

But sources familiar with the channel say that the denial was not surprising and likely stemmed from internal politics. The company was not ready to announce the channel at the time of the MSNBC.com report. And with layoffs at Warner Music and Time Inc. currently underway — and more layoffs on the horizon — executives might have felt it would seem inappropriate to be seen emphasizing new areas.

Most of the discussion about the cable channel have been very high level among executives in Virginia and New York, and the denial from Turner executives in Atlanta indicated that either the Turner crowd was out of the loop, or making a political statement, sources said.



To: Frank Ellis Morris who wrote (19930)4/2/2001 8:57:59 PM
From: puborectalis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24042
 
Insurance companies are the next group to warn...."....deterioration in the credit quality of its portfolio caused in part by a softening U.S. economy and certain industry specific economic weaknesses affecting many of its customers in those industries,"....http://cnnfn.cnn.com/2001/04/02/companies/wires/finova_wg/



To: Frank Ellis Morris who wrote (19930)4/3/2001 12:32:02 AM
From: puborectalis  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 24042
 
Streisand Blasts Bush in
Memo Sent to Top Democrats

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Calling President Bush a "destructive man," singing
legend Barbra Streisand on Monday fired off a blistering three-page memo to top
Democrats in Washington calling for a "strong, strategic, targeted offense against the
Republican revolution."

"This is not the time to be weak," Streisand writes in the memo titled "Nice Guys
Finish Last" sent last week to several dozen top Democratic legislators and released
to media outlets Monday through her publicist.

"Unless we win, we'll be consistently on the defensive with our fingers holding the
dike against the resurgence of the far right. ... You don't have to be ruthless like the
Republicans, just be strong."

In her note she blasts Bush's record on environmental issues, reproductive rights
and the protection of people with disabilities, children, and U.S. workers. She
lambastes the record of Bush's father, former President George Bush, on pardons,
and urges Democrats and journalists to investigate Republicans vigorously, charging
that they are controlled by big business.

Streisand writes: "We have a president who was selected rather than elected. He
stole the presidency through family ties, arrogance and intimidation, employing
Republican operatives to exercise the tactics of voter fraud by disenfranchising
thousands of blacks, elderly Jews and other minorities."

Streisand's publicist Dick Guttman said on Monday that she has no aspirations to
become a politician and her motivation to send the memo was concern about the
issues and the American people.

"She said people confuse political passion with political ambition," Guttman said,
adding that since releasing the memo to Democrats last week Streisand has been
flooded with offers to speak publicly.

"She sent it to top Democrats who responded very favorably, to it calling it a very
important wake up call," Guttman said.



To: Frank Ellis Morris who wrote (19930)4/3/2001 12:46:27 AM
From: puborectalis  Respond to of 24042
 
Editor and Analyst Luciano Siracusano was the featured guest on AOL
MarketTalk produced by Sage on March 21. Here's the transcript of his
chat with investors. Chat live with our research analysts on AOL
MarketTalk Thursdays from 12-12:30p ET. Keyword: MarketTalk

At the last Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting, the
Federal Reserve promised to watch developments carefully. Now we
are told that consumer confidence rose while durable goods orders
fell. What Federal Reserve response, if any, is most likely in your
opinion?
Luciano Siracusano: I think the most likely response will be no action until
the mid-May meeting. I think at this point, the Federal Reserve is paying more
attention to consumer consumption and consumer confidence as it has a
larger impact on the economy. Corporate spending will be weak until corporate
managers are less fearful that the consumer is ready to tip the economy into
recession. Having said that, I do expect another 50 basis point cut in the
middle of May.



To: Frank Ellis Morris who wrote (19930)4/3/2001 12:21:51 PM
From: Master (Hijacked)  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24042
 
Frank, I saw it coming one year ago. Yet, today, there are still many defending the actions of that arse Greenspan...UNBELIEVABLE!

I've said it before and I'll say it again, a drop in interest rates alone will NOT revive the economy. We have passed that point where such a drop would have re-installed confidence. The only way to stop the collapse is to FIRE Greenspan. That will have a positive psychological impact on investors.

Vince



To: Frank Ellis Morris who wrote (19930)4/4/2001 7:08:39 AM
From: puborectalis  Respond to of 24042
 
World DRAM Price] Microchip Prices Continue Falling in Major
Markets

April 4, 2001 (TOKYO) -- A survey of world DRAM prices conducted by ICIS-LOR
showed that the moving average prices of DRAMs for large users and spot prices are
continuing to fall.

The moving average prices of 128Mb DRAMs (PC133, 16Mb x 8) for large users during
the 30-day period from Feb. 15-March 16, 2001, were US$5.20 in North America, US$4.63
in Europe, and US$5.07 in Asia, the survey said.

Compared with DRAM prices for the 30-day period ending March 9, the prices declined
3.06 percent in North America, dropped 8.56 percent in Europe, and dipped 4.91 percent
in Asia, the survey said.

Moreover, compared with the previous week, memory module prices for 128MB DIMM
(PC133) dropped 3.3 percent to US$31.43 in North America, fell 2.85 percent to US$33.43
in Europe, and declined 3.15 percent to US$32.23 in Asia.

Inventory adjustments of PCs continue although makers have different adjustment
plans, but uncertainties are hanging over future PC shipments, the survey said.

DRAM demand has moved upward compared with January when even lower prices
failed to boost demand, but the upward trend has failed to push up prices, the survey
said.



To: Frank Ellis Morris who wrote (19930)4/5/2001 4:00:08 PM
From: ColtonGang  Respond to of 24042
 
March layoffs highest since 1993
Job cuts top 500,000 since Dec. 1, study says
By Kristen Gerencher, CBS.MarketWatch.com
Last Update: 10:00 AM ET Apr 5, 2001


SAN FRANCISCO (CBS.MW) -- March job cut announcements at U.S. companies hit their highest level in eight years and exceeded 100,000 for the fourth consecutive month, according to a report released Thursday.





The March number brings the total since Dec. 1 to more than half a million.

Employers planned 162,867 layoffs last month, a 60 percent increase over February's 101,731 eliminated positions, Chicago outplacement firm Challenger, Gray and Christmas said.

"That is the single heaviest month we've seen since we began tracking these numbers in January 93," firm president John Challenger told CBS.MarketWatch.com.

Watch the interview with John Challenger.

Cuts from December, 2000 through March totaled 540,519 compared with 186,535 announced for the same four-month period a year ago.

Accounting for lag time

As the economy slows, analysts are looking for signs of a recession -- defined as two consecutive quarters of negative growth -- and their search includes scrutinizing the national unemployment numbers for weakness. The U.S. Labor Dept. will release its March report Friday.

The jobless rate -- a count of how many Americans are unemployed, have actively looked for work in the prior four weeks and are available to work -- has been hovering at a relatively low 4.2 percent for the last two months.

Analysts polled by CBS MarketWatch expect Friday's report will show an uptick to 4.3 percent unemployment and that job growth will slow to 67,000 jobs from 135,000 last month. See full story.

The government indicator is known to lag hiring and firing activity, Challenger said.

"In 92, after the recession was over, unemployment six months later hit the highest rate during that period of time at 7.8 percent, almost double what we're seeing today," he said.

Compared with the beginning of the slowdown in mid-2000, so-called new economy sectors are now subjected to cost-cutting moves that once settled in old economy businesses, Challenger said. Layoffs are happening in telecommunications, computers and e-commerce where they used to be concentrated mainly in industrial, automotive, manufacturing, and retail sectors.

Still, some sectors are chugging along with higher job security, Challenger said, naming electrical power, oil and gas, aerospace defense, mortgage banking, health care, and foods as examples.

"There are a number of areas in this economy -- basic industries -- that are going to be fine despite the slowdown," he said.

At the same time companies were canning large numbers of employees, turnover at the top slowed. The number of chief executives leaving their posts dropped to 88 in March, a 26 percent decline from February's 119 CEO departures, Challenger said.

"That is a sign that perhaps companies are beginning to pull back and not just shove the CEO out at the first sign of bad news," he said.

Not so trigger-happy


Despite the perception that employers slash jobs as soon as budgets tighten, many typically delay layoffs, said David Neumark, a labor economist and visiting fellow at the Public Policy Institute.

"There's probably a pretty serious component of fixed costs to hiring and firing workers so you kind of hold onto them until you're sure" there's a slowdown, he said. "Then when you know things are bad, which is usually after they are, you're more inclined to make that decision."

While Challenger's job cuts survey and the unemployment report give some insight into the overall labor market, both give only a partial picture, Neumark said.

Not everyone who loses a job shows up in government surveys or applies for unemployment insurance, and companies don't always end up downsizing through pink slips even when they announce layoffs, he said.

Firms may try to achieve their staffing targets through a combination of methods such as attrition, less hiring, and giving financial incentives to older workers who volunteer to retire early.

An element of psychology may also impact how analysts interpret various unemployment statistics.

Said Neumark: "If you think there's layoffs going on all the time but you start to look for them when you have other signs of an economic downturn, you may find more stories about them."

Kristen



To: Frank Ellis Morris who wrote (19930)4/29/2001 11:44:24 PM
From: puborectalis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24042
 
Bankruptcies soar as
economy fades

Northern California residents, businesses having hard time
coping

BY DEBORAH LOHSE
Mercury News

Bankruptcies for Northern California residents and businesses are at their
highest in two years because of the eroding economy, layoffs and fears of
pending changes in bankruptcy law, and it's likely to get worse before it gets
better, experts said.

In the northern judicial district of California, 2,181 businesses or individuals
filed for various types of bankruptcy relief in March. That's the highest level
since June 1999, with 2,363 filings, and up considerably from the 1,460 such
filings in February.

``Those statistics are what I would have expected,'' said bankruptcy attorney
Michael Malter of Binder & Malter in Santa Clara. ``Every bankruptcy
attorney I know has more business than they know what to do with.''

The northern district serves 15 counties, including Santa Clara, San Mateo
and San Francisco. In San Jose and surrounding areas alone, the number of
Chapter 7, 13 and 11 filings spiked to 709, the highest since 725 such filings
in May of 1999.

The trend appears to be nationwide, said David Light, editor of Consumer
Bankruptcy News. Nationwide figures won't be out for a few weeks, but
areas including Seattle and Salt Lake City report similar filing surges, he said.

Businesses have been hurt by the lagging economy, the death of dot-coms
and the resultant pressure on other companies that served them.

Attorney Malter said he has been counseling many businesses through
bankruptcy proceedings lately, and expects the death toll to keep rising.
Moreover, he expects many of them to file for Chapter 7 -- a total debt
wipe-out -- rather than a reorganization.

Many high-tech companies don't have much in the way of hard assets, and
those they have are competing to be sold in a market glutted with dot-com
fire-sale items. And venture capitalists, who backed many of these failed
businesses, are less likely than banks to help them work out from under,
Malter said.

On the personal level, a big culprit is the increasing number of layoffs.
Announced layoffs reached a level of 162,867 in March, a record at least
since 1993, according to outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas.

``A lot of people are thinking of bankruptcy just because they are looking at
unemployment for the first time in their lives,'' said T. Michael Turner, a Menlo
Park bankruptcy attorney.

Turner said he'd been consulted by a young tech worker who'd racked up
$30,000 in credit-card debt while he got his MBA, and now has been laid
off.

``With credit-card rates being what they are, that's a very hard debt to service
unless you have a really good job,'' said Turner.

People also are fearful that a federal law pending in Congress would make it
harder for them to file Chapter 7, by adding administrative hurdles and
inserting a new ``means test''. Though the bill -- which is still in Congress --
wouldn't take effect for probably six months after passage, many people
believe ``the bankruptcy hospital door is about to close,'' said James ``Ike''
Shulman, a San Jose lawyer and legislative chair of the National Association
of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys.

``A lot of people who had been contemplating bankruptcy and putting it off
have heard the news and panicked,'' said Shulman.

Another factor may be a nasty tax problem facing many high-tech employees,
attorneys said. Many such people exercised stock options last year when the
stocks were at record levels, without actually selling the shares. In countless
cases, they now owe hundreds of thousands of dollars in tax based on very
high values, yet have no actual cash to pay the bills.

``I'm very interested to see what the post-April 15 spike (in bankruptcies) is
going to look like,'' said Malter.

Several attorneys said clients often wrongly believe that bankruptcy is a
panacea.

Turner said he recently counseled a couple that wanted to file for bankruptcy
until they learned it wouldn't help them keep their $1 million home in Palo
Alto.

The pair had jobs in high-tech and had qualified for a mortgage, otherwise out
of their reach, partly because they had stock options. But those options are
now worth half their former value and the pair have at most a year before
they're under water. If they went bankrupt, they stood to get at most about
$100,000 of any equity they'd built up, but lose the house.

``Both of them were very upset,'' said Turner. ``I had to counsel them that
bankruptcy probably wouldn't solve their problem.''