Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Winter in the Great White North -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Frankly Speaking who wrote (523)	4/2/2001 10:46:05 PM
From: ralfph	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8273

thanks for the sites Oh inteligent ones UP- it would be nice to know who sold on the way up and who shorted her as well. QBX-the fact that it did not go up with UP says tons. What will be more interesting is to see if QBX ever sells UP NOR-great PE ratio and it pays 80 cents a year. PDG- losing money and it is still worth 13 bucks? With the bears running the show it is interesting to see that the whole game still does not make alot of sence. Why would a company that is losing money have a higher share price than one that does? NT- three billion shares out and they are losing money but it is going for 22 bucks a share? I is confused. CPT-Boy do the adds for this puppy look awsume. Perhaps yahoo wants a global trading site ? I would accept a share for share swap. gotta go thanks again rrrrrraaaaaaaaalllllllllfffffffffffppppppppppppphhhhhhhhhhhhh

To: Frankly Speaking who wrote (523)	4/3/2001 12:04:22 AM
From: marcos	Respond to of 8273

Maybe UP stands for F___-up ... looks like it got sold off into weak bids following some sizable crosses - stockcharts.com ... stockwatch broker summary says average price for the day was 7.70 ... so i don't know if i'd be worried if i was a longterm holder ... could have been a dip in natgas? ... or the thing just needs to come back to test its 50-day? ... don't know ... uph.v is still well under NAV anyway, and that's what matters to qbx. Every time adding qbx i recite to myself 'thou shalt not hold thy breath on this one' ... imho the plan is to bore all small holders out of the thing, this being the accumulation stage ... which can go on for a very long time, because it's that very length of time working in their favour .... then one day they'll move it, and there won't be a lot of time to get in for those who fancy themselves as hotshot traders, CC or some jitney house will just chomp right through the offers while leaving in big scarey decoy offers of their own .... we know this will happen, we just don't know when ... i don't see any reason why the time is near, it's not like a takeout offer is likely [for qbx] [uph.v yes] [i don't see any reason why the time is far away either] ... suppose they realise big cash or paper value from some holding, so what - the thing is already trading so far below the value of its holdings it's ridiculous .... this one moves when it gets moved, and not until, and in the meantime there is a concerted effort to bore people out of the thing, and on me it won't work. But i do call it names, yes ... none printable here though -g-