Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: donald sew who wrote (4735)	4/2/2001 10:45:14 PM
From: Challo Jeregy	Respond to of 52237

Darn, I would want to inspect the plane to what type of food they had on board. LOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!! Donald, would they have dumplings???? You are sooo funny.<g>

To: donald sew who wrote (4735)	4/2/2001 11:02:43 PM
From: Caxton Rhodes	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 52237

Doanld I agree with you about the Chinese government wanting to see what's on the plane. As far as who is at fault, it seems to me it is obviously the fighter. It's like saying 1967 volkswagen going at 55 caused the crash of a 2001 porsche going 175. I'll be the fighter was was screwing with the plane and messed up. The Chinese know that. I'll bet this turns into no big deal. Caxton

To: donald sew who wrote (4735)	4/2/2001 11:05:57 PM
From: Chris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 52237

i think the chinese govt ordered the fighter to smash into the spy plane. but im biased since im against communist china.

To: donald sew who wrote (4735)	4/2/2001 11:18:24 PM
From: Gary D	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 52237

Re: "I wouldnt be investing in companies which are highly leveraged in China, like QCOM." I agree. An example I heard of is a case where China opened a remote area to petroleum exploration for foreign companies without disclosing that they had already punched a number of exploration wells and determined for themselves that the area is not very prospective. Significant moneys were likely wasted in "reevaluating" the area.

To: donald sew who wrote (4735)	4/3/2001 12:23:25 AM
From: dawgfan2000	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 52237

Hi Don, I certainly would not call myself an expert (or good student) of our history with China. I agree with you on your points too. Sometimes I think the good ol' USofA needs to take a little bit of its own medicine. And I hope cooler heads prevail. If a Russian MIG landed on US soil, would we not be all over it like Stock Attackers on dumplings? -gg- Of course, and I am sure China is asking some of the same questions we would - "what the heck is on that plane? You sure do want it back badly enough." That said, I feel Tuesday, we should have some answers, or we start to add some stimulus. But my trust of their government is skeptical. Where is this other pilot (besides being debriefed). I'm sure he is being explained what to say -ng- I hope this thing was accidental, and not intentional. Talk about bad blood. . There sure are a lot of questions out there about how a plane was lost and who is to blame. I think this gives GW a good exercise in foreign relations and he will be watched carefully for any weakness and strength. I hope he remains firm and seems to be on track. And China looks like a good short right now. BTW, Japan is cranking it up tonight, +300.