SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Win Smith who wrote (10254)4/3/2001 4:34:01 PM
From: LTK007  Respond to of 82486
 
Win i have one great wish,that that term DARK be cancelled by those who write about this as it is extremely misleading.The dark means ONLY that we can't see it therefore it is viewed as dark --as one physicist said if we break this secret it could possibly reveal that everything we know about everything will be overturned.paxmax



To: Win Smith who wrote (10254)4/3/2001 4:40:37 PM
From: LTK007  Respond to of 82486
 
i love this fact that was reported in the article <<Einstein himself thought the force, which he called the cosmological constant, was so strange that he later repudiated his conjecture.>> the boldface was added by me.max



To: Win Smith who wrote (10254)4/3/2001 4:57:13 PM
From: LTK007  Respond to of 82486
 
win got to say one more thing and that this is exciting--getting the feel for this now.The dark matter(invisible mass) (accepted) now has had it's other established, that being dark energy(invisible energy)--we have a whole otherness now.
i get sticky about "dark" because it means that which neither absorbs reflects nor radiates light,and i say that is OUR light,that is--it's like prejudicial:) paxmax


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News