Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jim kelley who wrote (69579)	4/3/2001 4:24:04 PM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Jim, Good to see the folks on the cesspool thread are developing a sense of humor. Please pass on my congratulations. BTW: I have always found history to be fascinating. Those who don't remember are ........ Scumbria

To: jim kelley who wrote (69579)	4/4/2001 11:23:45 AM
From: blake_paterson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

jim / longs: just checking in from vacation and it looks like the bad guys have taken over the board...yikes! Amazing thing is, they think people believe their posts! ROTFLMAO.. Take a look at this document list: rambusite.com 25 plus documents from 1990-92 in which IP is likely to have been disclosed by Rambus to Siemens. Imagine what the list would have looked like before they (Siemens) ran the paper shredder, threw the back-up tapes and floppies away and cleared their old HD's. Based on the latest court transcripts, it appears that IFX is no longer pressing the RMBS-JEDEC issue. And they no longer question the validity of the RMBS patents. And they openly admit to "working around the patents." It's just that there is "no infringement." And it was "legal." Pretty soon they'll claim it was done in good faith. LOL. Looks to me like the judge may have (unintentionally) laid a trap for IFX in the form of his Markman interpretations. IFX has turned on its other arguments (above) to focus on this card, the rulings are nearly appeal proof (at least by the defense), and 3/4 patents appears to hold even under the narrowed definitions. Bloodied but still long. BP