SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Lucent Technologies (LU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: EACarl who wrote (18003)4/3/2001 5:42:34 PM
From: smallcapmaven  Respond to of 21876
 
I agree... biz.yahoo.com
>>>LUCENT PLEDGES ALL ASSETS

Most investment-grade corporations can still get bank credit without collateral pledges, banking experts say. But companies that are under financial stress or in troubled industries are being pressed to offer credit enhancements.

``Now we're seeing the banks crack down on companies with ratings in the middle to low triple-B range,'' said Reynolds. ``We saw it most dramatically with Lucent, and we're seeing it with others.''

Telecommunications equipment giant Lucent Technologies Inc. (NYSE:LU - news) in February agreed to pledge substantially all of its assets as collateral for $6.5 billion in bank credit facilities, despite its investment-grade ratings.

Struggling to restructure its operations and recover from huge losses, Lucent had little choice, analysts said.

``They absolutely had to have the bank facilities, otherwise it would have been difficult to maintain ongoing operations,'' said Mike Weaver, an analyst who covers the company for Fitch.<<<

The shareholders don't have any equity in the stock so there is no value...IMO this is not good and leaves common holders out in the cold...

New layoffs announced, which although necessary are not good news because there is such a drop in demand...

dailynews.yahoo.com



To: EACarl who wrote (18003)4/3/2001 6:06:39 PM
From: John Soileau  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21876
 
The liquidity issues were there when this stock was $28 (maybe higher). They have been, are, and will be there for some time. Point is, unless there's a bankruptcy the stock is much more of a VALUE at $7 than it was at $28 (some would say 4 times better!), and certainly at $68. It does appear that the stock is now selling at or less than book value.
John