Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Trader who wrote (44979)	4/3/2001 6:48:59 PM
From: Math Junkie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70976

John, I don't think we're going to go to war over an airplane accident. The high tech gear on board is water under the bridge, IMO.

To: John Trader who wrote (44979)	4/3/2001 7:04:33 PM
From: Gottfried	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 70976

John, no comment on the plane, but an interesting show on CNBC at 7:30 EST [Dick Arms, inventor of the indicator, calling the bottom] Message 15608772 Since this is third hand info, I can't vouch for it. Here's the Barron's Hays interview discussing the effectiveness of the Arms indicator in the past suite101.com open message 16 Gottfried

To: John Trader who wrote (44979)	4/3/2001 7:05:37 PM
From: Brian Sullivan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70976

You mean bail out and die, which is not something that we would ever ask of our servicemen. The chance of a water rescue near the China coast is very remote. This is a bit like the Gary Powers incident all over again. I'm not sure what else can be done other than cease the spy missions or provide a fighter escort, backed up with a shoot to kill missile.