Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : PALM - The rebirth of Palm Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mang Cheng who wrote (4604)	4/3/2001 8:12:54 PM
From: Sawtooth	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6784

Hello, Mang. Are you a buyer at this price? .......VVVVVVVVV

To: Mang Cheng who wrote (4604)	4/3/2001 9:06:12 PM
From: Win-Lose-Draw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6784

"result is a screen that is a bit dimmer than the Palm IIIc or Visor Prism, but still quite acceptable." I, for one, am not the least bit interested in dropping $400+ on a screen that is "acceptable".

To: Mang Cheng who wrote (4604)	4/4/2001 3:49:58 AM
From: lkj	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6784

Mang, the result is a screen that is a bit dimmer than the Palm IIIc or Visor Prism, but still quite acceptable. It clearly shows that the quality of the m505 screen really depends on who is looking at it, and what considerations that person is using. For me, battery life is the number one concern. It's always a bad color screen if it wears too much on battery. In my opinion, the m505 should sell pretty well. I might change my mind after I see it, but at this point, I would rather have the m505 than the m500 or any CE device out there. Meanwhile, the quality of this thread is getting ever worse. I might as well go meet Mark and chat in a coffee shop or something. Regards, Khan