SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gary Ng who wrote (131594)4/6/2001 12:58:53 AM
From: Rob Young  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
"IA64 systems at $25 billion in 2003"

---

All happy thinking. Everyone wants to jump out there and
suppose this baby is really going to take off. Look at
another 2003 prediction for IA64:

linleygroup.com

March 2000

Even if IA-64 processors merely match the performance of their RISC competitors, they are likely to dominate the workstation and server markets, achieving a market share in excess of 60% by 2003.

And yet, 7 months later, whistling a new tune:

eetimes.com

October 2000

Itanium will still make a splash in the server market. But I expect most Itanium systems sold next year will be used for software development or in customer validation; volume deployment will occur only at a limited number of sites.

...

McKinley, not Itanium, will determine the fate of IA-64. If McKinley meets its performance promises, IA-64 may yet dominate the server market. ["Yet?" What happened to 60% in
2003? Florida election officials counting those
potential dangling McKinley sales?] But if McKinley doesn't deliver, IA-64 isn't going to get a third chance.
[Why not? Doesn't it take Microsoft 3 rounds to get it
right?]
---

Diminished expectations within 7 months. More importantly,
we see that in March Y2K Linley is fed and regurgitates "60% market share in 2003". The server space today is $60 billion, which means with zero growth Intel will be doing
$36 billion in Itanium/Itanium+ server sales in 2003. But
now another analyst is fed $25 billion as the goalposts
shift. So maybe we are down to 25% of the market in 2003.
This time next year the numbers will line up so that we
will be down to 10% of the market in 2003 and no one will
be any wiser. Or so the reasoning goes. . .

Rob