SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: richanfamus who wrote (34830)4/4/2001 3:09:09 PM
From: andreas_wonischRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Rich, Re: Your comment reflects that of those who are very new to the semiconductor industry.

You are saying that to wrong person... For how many years is JC already running his site?

But suing your customer is not what is normally done in the semiconductor business.

Signing long-term contracts is also not what is normally done in the semiconductor business. But if you sign one, you have to stick to it. I don't know why this simple concept is so difficult to understand. A deal is a deal. Alcatel could have signed a deal with another flash manufacturer for a quarter or so, if they wanted (and had found one) but they decided to sign a two-year contract with AMD instead. AMD would have never provided them with flash (they could have sold it for more money at that time) if they knew Alcatel would breach the contract shortly thereafter. You don't get a reputation in the semiconductor business, if you are not honoring your contracts. IMO there's no excuse for Alcatel's behavior.

Andreas



To: richanfamus who wrote (34830)4/4/2001 4:02:43 PM
From: jcholewaRespond to of 275872
 
> How would you react if AMD's silicon wafer suppliers decided to sue AMD because AMD delayed - or refused
> acceptance- of wafers that AMD had agreed to purchase 9 months ago during shortages?

AMD would be responsible to any and all contractual obligations.

> I'm sure you'd be whistling out of the other side of your mouth.

Maybe you'd fall prey to such a double standard, but I wouldn't. Some of us believe that the law exists for a reason.

-JC



To: richanfamus who wrote (34830)4/4/2001 4:41:55 PM
From: Neil BoothRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
How would you react if AMD's silicon wafer suppliers decided to sue AMD because AMD delayed - or refused acceptance- of wafers that AMD had agreed to purchase 9 months ago during shortages?

If it looks like a troll, smells like a troll, and sounds like a troll, it IS a troll!

FWIW I'd be disappointed in AMD (or any company) if it breaks its contracts. Christ, what is society coming to if people think it's normal to break contracts? I hope all you trying to paint this as natural live in the U.S.; but I can tell you it isn't natural anywhere else I've been.

Neil.



To: richanfamus who wrote (34830)4/4/2001 6:00:36 PM
From: AK2004Respond to of 275872
 
rich an' famus
company that I work for agreed to be bought for some shares of the other company. From the last night news (public) it looks like that our company may walk away from the deal.
Our company would pay $600,000,000 to walk away so why is that that amd/alcatel contract should be less binding?
Regards
-Albert