SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pgerassi who wrote (34904)4/4/2001 6:53:22 PM
From: Joe NYCRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Pete,

Thanks for the info.

My conversion is from 720x576 pixels x 25 fps to 352x240 x 29.97 fps. Audio is also resampled from 48kbs to 5 channels to 44kbs, I don't know how many channels, probably 2.

I don't know what you mean by bitrate. Is this just a multiplication of the pixels x color depth x frame rate, or does it have something to do with the quality of conversion?

So 4 frames per second is not unreasonable to a MPEG-4 VCD for a 320x240x30 resolution on a dual Celeron 366MHz using the DIVX encoder. IIRC a 1.2G Tbird does this at 18-24 fps depending on FSB/memory setup.

I am not sure if that's what I am doing. I am doing VCD, but from something I read, I don't think it is MPEG-4. I think it is fairly primitive, only MPEG-1. From what I can see, this experiment is going nowhere, since I am now at 370 MB output size, and not yet in the middle of the movie. It will not fit on the CD.

I will have to figure out something with the sound, since I may be carrying over more channels than I need. Also, there is soething called SVCD, which has a variable bit rate, with higher quality, but may result in lower output size because of variable bit rate. VCD has a fixed bit rate, which must mean a very primitive compression scheme. It also looks at the preview that there is a black frame around the picture, which I will try to get rid of.

Joe