Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ahhaha who wrote (1680)	4/5/2001 12:50:28 AM
From: Ahda	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 24758

I recommend you reread what I wrote, I did so with full comprehension as I understand the concept. It was with deepest respect I hoped you could express far more profoundly than I ever will ever be able to the problems that are existent are non existent but viewed as existent due to the sentiment in the publics eyes. No where did I state that poverty should be forced upon wealth to level the field i stated the publics view had nothing to do with true vision and growth, but the public sentiment which frequently mushrooms from emotion and not logic is flawed. The market has clearly stated the result that comes from this method of approach in the last balloon. I have no desire to sock the poor but educate them and put them on equal grounds intellectually.

To: ahhaha who wrote (1680)	4/5/2001 12:53:40 AM
From: ahhaha	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 24758

I've been over on the gfold thread. Truly amazing self defeating crap artistry going on there. It's notable because it shows the difference a good education makes. Those people analyze nothing. They're sensationalists trying to push their own buttons. I don't think they ever made a sincere effort to get at the truth. That's arm chair amateurism at its worst. This is my last gold sojourn. I'm abandoning it forever. I don't care what it does. I don't like the people involved with it.

To: ahhaha who wrote (1680)	4/5/2001 2:21:18 PM
From: Michael Collings	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24758

Ahhaha: I think you have it wrong on this post.... I have often wondered why the poor and the minorities back the democrats. As I see it the democrats limit personal initiative. Their approach is more along the lines of: Don't worry, we'll take care of you. Just stay in your slums, stay uneducated, keep having 'out of wedlock' children, and don't worry about it because we will give you enough subsistence to keep you there. After all these years, I'm astonished that the minorities and the poor still buy this logic.