Re: 3/31-4/4/01 - [STGI/SPHC] SPHC Sues Anonymous Internet Users (part 2 of 2)
By: xcessive $$$
Reply To: 7738 by shadowfax8x $$$ Wednesday, 4 Apr 2001 at 12:21 AM EDT
Post # of 7777
shadowfax8x...... I would like to see the original Complaint... Can you post it or provide a link???
District Court Clark County Case # A 427252 (actually when you arrive at the district court page where you type the case number you need to type 00 A 427252
courtgate.coca.co.clark.nv.us:8490/DistrictCourt/asp/CaseNo.asp
When was this suit(s) filed against the posters in question???
It was originally filed in December 2000. The law firm never properly served the defendants but had a person in court ready to lie when this issue was contested. They also were able to influence the discovery commissioner, partially through what is believed to be false claims of Georgetowns insistence, prior to proper service to issue an order for discovery with the Raging Bull. Then they were able to get a second order from the discovery commissioner for the raging bull without notifying the defendants. This filing made the outrageous claim that the defendants were soliciting proxies. The raging bull keeper of the records was deposed today in an effort to further intimidate additional posters to the raging bull..
Did RagingBull provide you with ample time to quash the subpoena prior to giving up your identity to the plaintiffs??? I'm not sure but I believe they gave some type of notice with a number to call the Raging Bull. But nobody from the raging bull would respond...
"first day of the trial" or a hearing???
No trial date as of yet and this law firm has a history of filing frivolous motions, in a related ongoing case there are over 400 motions filed since June 2000
Is the venue in Las Vegas for all of the JD posters???
Las Vegas is the place, so come out!!
What are some of the things this group has done;
(1) issued more shares than authorized, (issued over 26M shares when only 25M were authorized)
(2) bogus resumes with false claims of being associate professors and presidential appointments. We're not talking about exaggerations, we're talking lies,
(3) never held a shareholder meeting, never,
recently changed the name without changing the name , currently listed with the NASD bulletin Board as Samaritan Pharmaceuticals (there is no corporation with the name Samaritan Pharmaceuticals)
Issuing stock certificates that read "SAMARITAN PHARMACEUTICALS" Incorporated Under the laws of the State of Nevada....
and the list goes on which I will discuss with you tomorrow in the chat room at johndoes.org......
ragingbull.lycos.com
=====
By: xcessive $$$
Reply To: 7749 by chohenhous $$$$ Wednesday, 4 Apr 2001 at 11:45 PM EDT
Post # of 7777
STGI is currently in discussions with a company that holds worldwide patents on a novel drug-delivery system. all BS
This is one of there ridiculous discoveries. Not one of the management people have any medical experience. Greeson ran a insurance 'scam" that made "48 Hours" in the early 90s and resulted in at least one Doctor going to jail. The scam resulted in millions of dollars in fraud according to Blue Shield / Blue Cross. The treatment centers were fat farms. What she did was fill beds in psychiatric hospitals with people who wanted to lose weight but they were admitted as psychiatric patients which according to "48 Hours" some people weren't aware of. Everyone in the program ended up with a psychiatric profile that follows you around the rest of your life. None of psychiatric profiles were true.
Greeson calls herself Doctor Greeson but she has never been a licensed psychologist because the Ph.D. is a mail order degree.
The delivery system was a 1990 technology already rejected by every major pharma company in the United States. The guy who developed this delivery system had no medical training but was able to get 15 minutes of fame in the early 1990s.
ragingbull.lycos.com
=====
By: NewVoice23 $$$
Reply To: 7706 by baiter $$$ Wednesday, 4 Apr 2001 at 11:56 PM EDT
Post # of 7778
Dear Mr. Baiter:
Please stay gone a long time, as one less apologist for Greeson et al. is one less apologist for Greeson et al.
Please let me reverse the litmus test. Will you substantiate 100% of every assertion made by Greeson et al. in their myriad fluff press releases, in their SEC filings, in their public statements, in their FDA filings?
Mr. Excessive may not be batting 1000, but if he is batting even .010, every stockholder who is not shorting the stock should be greatly concerned. Management cannot make any false statements or fail to disclose any material events and remain within SEC rules, much less the ethics of standard business practice.
It seems quite likely that in fact Mr. Excessive is batting better than Ted Williams in the best year of his career.
However, my conclusion in this matter, and those of others who concur on this board, has nothing to do with what Mr. Excessive does nor does not post on this board.
Have you carefully digested and compared every press release, every SEC filing, every public statement of this gang? Have you tracked every hit on google, lycos, excite, bigfoot, msn, yahoo for "Janet Greeson", "Gene Boyle", "Bert Wollen" to its final end? Have you searched district and state court filings in California, Texas, Nevada, Connecticut, District of Columbia, and North Carolina involving these three names? Have you searched similarly in Mexico, Singapore, Hong Kong, and the Caymans?
When you are finished, please let us know what you find and what you think.
New Voice 23
Your concept that Mr Excessive
ragingbull.lycos.com
=====
By: xcessive $$$
Reply To: 7753 by chohenhous $$$$ Thursday, 5 Apr 2001 at 12:12 AM EDT
Post # of 7778
chohenhous.....
The case you make reference to is Clark County District Court case A 420721 (type in 00 A 420721) and Dr. Sapse and 85 shareholders sued STGI Management. The problem was Dr. Sapse's lawyers were complete incompetents, a law firm called Hutchison & Steffen. The most junior person in the firm Mark Karris was the lawyer.
The evidence in this case was so overwhelming that a District judge ordered an injunction and an "order against self-dealing" against manegement and Karris didn't know what to do next....The judge ordered a shareholder meeting and appointed a special master and the Greeson Gangs lawyer appealed to the State Supreme Court. No depositions have ever been taken in this case with over 400 entries already. STALL, STALL, STALL...
Prior to appealing to the State Supreme Court at the Doctors insistence Karris finally asked the discovery commissioner to see the articles of incorporation, bylaws, and shareholder book. The Greeson lawyers filed a frivolous motion that so incessed the discovery commissioner that he attached his decision to the door. That's when the Greeson Gangs lawyers filed with the State Supreme Court and that is where the case is now. ON HOLD!
Dr Sapse and the 85 shareholders has replaced his counsel.
The Greeson Gang also have a hit-man name Jim Burnham who hasn't posted lately but has a web site he would link to his posts to defame Dr. Sapse that has filings that were dismissed and a variety of other trash (http://www.jimburnham.com) This site was created by management to smear Dr. Sapse the creator of the drug Anticort. The Greeson lawyer's in a recent court appearance said their objective was to "cancel" all the shares Dr. Sapse has in STGI/SPHC. Dr. Sapse was the creator of the drug Anticort which the company is based on, no Anticort, no Dr. Sapse, No STGI/SPHC.....
Dr. Sapse never lost in court his attorneys were just to incompetent to enforce their victories.
ragingbull.lycos.com
=====
By: JimBurnham $$$
Reply To: 7752 by chohenhous $$$$ Thursday, 5 Apr 2001 at 12:12 AM EDT
Post # of 7778
Look into the situation carefully. Much like bipockets, you may find that the people you are supporting are not worthy of the effort.
Keep in mind that the first SLAPP attack in this mess was instigated by the person that xcessive was supporting. If you look back at past messages you will notice that xcessive did not mind that SLAPP attack.
Not that I am saying SLAPP is okay. Far from it. There is just more here than meets the eye.
Jim
ragingbull.lycos.com
=====
By: NewVoice23 $$$
Reply To: 7706 by baiter $$$ Thursday, 5 Apr 2001 at 12:53 AM EDT
Post # of 7778
New Voice Goes Post All #2
Dear Mr. Baiter:
I had tired of the pointless games on this board with Mr Burnham, who was unable to countenance any view but his own blind one, and I had therefore postponed further episodes of going "postal".
However his recent absence and your emergence as the major defender of Greeson et al. would appear to make it possible for reason and evidence to be pertinent to the discussions on this board- but I hope I am not over estimating you, Mr. Baiter. We shall see.
In any case, on what evidence do I base my belief that Greeson et al. should be fired?
Please let me cite just two small, easily verifiable examples justifying "for cause" dismissal of Greeson et al. Other examples will follow in other "Post Alls" from time to time, the timing of which will be based on whim and circumstance.
Please do not worry, Mr. Baiter; these two examples are only two of many others that are also easily verifiable, if you follow the advice in my previous post and really look into the records of Greeson et al. No one who looks into the matter is likely to run out of ammunition against them in this century, given the performance of this gang to date.
Post All #2: Illegal Personal Use of Anticort By Dr. Greeson
In what she thought was a positive public relations move on behalf of Anticort and STGI, Dr. Greeson revealed that she herself was taking Anticort, and of course that Anticort had remarkably beneficial effects on her personally. An interview with these statements was posted on the website of a health "personage". Dr. Greeson was executive vice president of STGI at the time. Too bad that Dr. Greeson either was unaware of, or chose to ignore, the very strict rules in the code of federal regulations that prohibit any distribution of investigational drugs except under protocols that have FDA and local institutional review board approvals. The only more foolish step that a senior executive of a pharmaceutical company could take other than to personally use the company's own investigational drug illegally would be to talk about doing so publicly. Mr. Baiter, if you cannot find documentation of these facts in prior posts on this board, you certainly are not going to find the rest of what I pointed you towards.
Post All #3: False statement in SEC filing of April 2000
Second, in her SEC filing of April 2000, Dr. Greeson and Mr. Wollen (now in absentia) stated flatly that they expected final approval of Anticort in HIV in 2001. As previous posts on this board have shown, it would take great good fortune, 30 million in cash, and a minimum of 26 months after the money showed up for an approval of Anticort in HIV to be possible. One cannot move from PhaseI/Phase IIa to approval. This false statement about "final" approval in 2001 in the SEC filing of April 2000 by Greeson et al. either their incompetence, or their willingness to deliberately mislead the investing public.
Again Mr. Baiter, if you cannot even find the evidence backing up these statements in their SEC filing of April 2000, and in previous posts on this board, you are highly unlikely to begin to fathom the real depths of this tale.
Hope you catch something.
Yours truly
New Voice 23
ragingbull.lycos.com
=====
By: xcessive $$$
Reply To: 7764 by shadowfax8x $$$ Thursday, 5 Apr 2001 at 2:35 AM EDT
Post # of 7778
shadowfax8x....You want to see malicious libel go to
jimburnham.com
He posts filings selective and not the final decisions. For example you will see a bunch of filings made about Dr. Sapse and initially there was an injunction against him by the court. Which is understandable. The court should place an injunction against a private individual accused of interfering in a business. However once the facts were known the injunction was lifted and what resulted was an injunction against management and an order to stop "self-dealing." This information is noticeably absent from Mr. Burnhams web site.
These court orders are still in effect today and have been totally ignored by the Greeson Gang
ragingbull.lycos.com |
