SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (135727)4/5/2001 10:38:17 AM
From: haqihana  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Scum, Your post sounds like it is from a real loser from all directions. Don't worry sonny. As you grow up, things will change.



To: Scumbria who wrote (135727)4/5/2001 10:56:01 AM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Ha, that's a laugh. He got more votes than Clinton could ever dream of.



To: Scumbria who wrote (135727)4/5/2001 11:22:21 AM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
Scumbria, the Clinton administration demonstrated when you attack, then attempt to break up one of the most important companies in the new economy, Microsoft, the economy will eventually pay a price.

The downcycle in tech stocks started practically the day the Justice Department announced their intention to break up Microsoft. With an unlimited budget at their disposal, they've been successful in draining nearly 5 billion dollars from Microsoft, and transferring that hard-earned cash to high-priced lawyers who paid for it with campaign contributions.

I wonder if those clowns at Oracle, and AOL/Time Warner, along with and every other small tech company who loudly laughed at Microsoft's attack, are happy about the results nearly 1 year later.

The stock market has paid them back for this outrageous attack. As it has many investors who sat idly by and complained very little, because of jealousy, and the joy of seeing the richest man in the world getting some comeuppance. What they failed to see was the broader implications of our government assaulting one of the most important engines of economic growth. I ask you, what other nation would be that stupid? Instead of attacking such an amazing companies success in the world economy, every other nation on earth would have been applauding their success, and standing side-by-side with the leaders of such a company with pride. But no, these leftists "we need to even the playing field", Clinton appointees, (meaning take everyone down to the size of least common denominator) felt it just wasn't right to have a company kicking serious ass in the world economy, and growing 40% per year. Why? Simply because Bill Gates wasn't opening his checkbook wide enough toward the Democrat party. That's why....You can bet if Barbara Striesand, Ted Turner or Dan Rather were running Microsoft, they would have taken no such action.

We are all part of the same system, an attack on Microsoft, was an attack on American businesses.

I remember thinking at the time, is this the beginning of a huge tech correction? Being of the optimistic spirit, I hoped it wasn't.

History has proven otherwise.



To: Scumbria who wrote (135727)5/9/2001 10:36:20 PM
From: SecularBull  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Looks like a "hate message" to me.

Perhaps we need to refer this to the FBI.

~SB~



To: Scumbria who wrote (135727)5/9/2001 11:02:22 PM
From: SecularBull  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 769667
 
Sc, does this mean that you intend to do something about Bush being in the White House? Should we be concerned that you're planning something violent?

~SB~