Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ahda who wrote (1689)	4/5/2001 12:12:11 PM
From: ahhaha	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24758

First you should define what a safety zone of debt is. That's irrelevant. If you have a dollar whose return of value is diminishing then you want to pay down debt. You want to pay down debt during inflation? No, you want to borrow to buy appreciating assets. The reverse is also true one that increases in value allows more debt to be comfortably held. You can't project your individual situation onto macroeconomic structures. When you are where we are and inflation has been creeping across the nation there is the question of over evaluation. Yes, let's reduce the asking price for your house. We have seen a massive amount of debt taken on by the private sector and without a tax cut, this economy is in long term trouble. Debt, tax cut, and long term trouble are disconnected. Debt is never a threat. Without a tax cut the only outcome is mediocre growth and flat incomes especially at the low end. Neither of these factors put the country in long term trouble. Tax cuts as long range vehicles enable more free dollars to go back into the economy. The people end of the private sector has taken on too much debt and there by strapped themselves and limited the ability of growth in our economy. Are you saying that less debt allows the economy to grow faster so that more debt can be added? Debt creation doesn't slow growth. It does slow consumption expenditures briefly, but consumption expenditure is only a component determining growth. Indeed, high debt cools final demand so that industry has a chance to retool rather than devote resources serving production. The wonderful thing about the is that the wealth affect trickles down and frequently those that come from the lower end of society benefit because of scholarships given out. If your aim is to dismantle the education system you have created a new party because none i know of have this desire. The above and what went before is the Democrat's explanation of trickle down and they tear it down validly. They create this false figure so they can tear it down in order to pursue their one obsession:the war on wealth. You're just part of the milieu of mistaken belief that comes from the Democrat's disinformation campaign. California is saturated in socialism. It isn't possible for most of its citizens to separate the pack of lies generated in the media and at the universities from the truth which you will find nowhere there. You live in that milieu and so you can't separate out any truth. Your above statement is so sad that it is clear the regime of the gods and the slobs will remain securely in place. Further proof is that you have no idea what point I'm making.