SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (123114)4/5/2001 11:42:31 PM
From: H James Morris  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
I think head fake, but lets see if we can get 3 days in a row.
>4/5/01 7:45 PM ET
SAN FRANCISCO -- For one day at least, the glass looked half-full to a majority of investors. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 402.62, or 4.2%, today, notching its second-biggest point gain ever (although not similarly historic on a percentage basis). The S&P 500 gained 4.4%, and the Nasdaq Composite soared 8.9%, its third-largest percentage gain ever (although not similarly historic on a point basis).

The notable thing about today's advance was that it was spurred largely by the absence of bad news. Still, there were some actual positives, including the Bank of England's rate cut, which likely presages an easing by the European Central Bank next week. The ECB's failure to cut rates on March 29 was a mistake they will hopefully soon rectify. Coordinated efforts by central banks worldwide are necessary to combat the economic slowdown.
On the micro level, much of today's gains were accredited to Dell Computer (DELL:Nasdaq - news), which rose 13.5% after reaffirming its first-quarter guidance. Elsewhere, Yahoo! (YHOO:Nasdaq - news) rose 22.6% after Lehman Brothers' influential Holly Becker said the "worst is over" for the Web portal, while eBay (EBAY:Nasdaq - news) gained 14.6% after receiving positive comments from Deutsche Bank Alex. Brown. The Nasdaq 100 rose 10.8%.

Meanwhile, Alcoa (AA:NYSE - news) reported better-than-expected earnings, which helped nontech stocks overcome the profit warning from FDX (FDX:NYSE - news).

Reflecting the pervasive level of negativity, the rally was greeted with a lot of skepticism. Many observers, including several readers, noted trading volume -- at 1.3 billion shares on the New York Stock Exchange and 2.3 billion over-the-counter -- was down on this "up" day vs. recent sessions.

Clearly there are myriad reasons to suspect that this is yet another vicious bear market rally destined to dupe investors. Skeptics note that despite rising cynicism, sentiment indicators have yet to reflect anything approaching capitulation. For example, bullishness was unchanged at 48.9% in the most recent Investors Intelligence survey, while bears rose to 38.3% from 38% the previous week.

Still, the fact more people are eager to dismiss today's advance has me more hopeful it will lead to better things, as opposed to the two plus-7% gains the Comp produced in October that were eagerly embraced by would-be bottom pickers. When I outlined some reasons to be bullish recently, "gloating of the bears" was included. The bears are crowing these days, as evinced by the aforementioned pooh-poohing of today's rise.

Additionally, I recently received an unsolicited invitation (urging) to check in with the folks at Comstock Partners, one of the most outwardly bearish mutual fund groups in existence.

In an interview today, Charles Minter, co-manager of the Gabelli Comstock Partners Capital Value fund and Gabelli Comstock Partners Strategy fund, expressed a view reflecting that philosophy.
Death, Doom and Destruction

"I'm not really excited about the market today," Minter said. "Dell saying, 'We're not going to warn' is not going to provoke me to get out of the way of the terrible bear market I envision."

How terrible? Comstock's feverishly bearish outlook is predicated on two main issues: Valuation and the level of public participation in stocks.

At the firm's Web site (Comstockfunds.com) in a piece entitled "Limbo, Limbo, How Low Can It Go?" Minter and partner Marty Weiner detail how a host of valuation measures -- from the Dow's price to dividend ratio, to the S&P 500's price to book ratio, to the Nasdaq's regular old price-to-earnings ratio -- reached unforeseen peaks in March 2000. All those metrics would have to fall below trough levels that emerged during previous bear markets before the fund managers would even consider becoming constructive, much less bullish.

"After that kind of overvaluation in the greatest bubble in the history of the United States, I can't imagine [the bear market] could stop at normal valuations," Minter said. "It goes to trough [valuations] and probably below."

For example, the S&P 500's P/E bottomed at 7 in March 1937, January 1973 and September 1976, he said, citing data from Ned Davis Research. Estimating S&P 500 reported earnings for 2001 will be about $50 a share, excluding one-time write-offs, Minter said if the index traded at a P/E of 10 (much less 7), that would result in a price of 500 for the S&P. "That's what will go on if the bloodbath takes place as we expect."

The "public participation" argument is destined to be controversial. Those on Wall Street who think heavy public participation signals a market peak seem elitist for they are suggesting, de facto, that the public is foolish.

Minter acknowledged that it's not a popular viewpoint, but noted history is on his side, and not just in stocks. In addition to stock investing in the 1920s, heavy public participation in gold in the 1970s and oil in the 1980s also augured peaks in those markets.

The public's level of interest (obsession?) with the stock market in recent years "has got to be a signal to look at for a climactic ending," he said, noting that February 2000 saw record inflows into equity mutual funds as well as new stock issuance and secondary offerings. "People that come in late get killed."

Clearly the skeptical approach has served Comstock well of late. The roughly $32 million Strategy fund was up 1.7% in 2000 and 12.2% in the first quarter of 2001, according to Morningstar.com. The $55 million Capital Value fund, which can (and does) short individual stocks and stock futures as well as use leverage, was up 10.1% last year and 21.7% in the first quarter.

Comstock has previously shorted tech bellwethers including Dell, Cisco Systems (CSCO:Nasdaq - news), Oracle (ORCL:Nasdaq - news), Amazon.com (AMZN:Nasdaq - news), Brocade (BRCD:Nasdaq - news) and the Nasdaq 100 Trust (QQQ:Amex - news), and "still has significant short positions in Nasdaq stocks," Minter said, although he declined to specify.

Additionally, because of what they view as a technical breakdown of long-term uptrends for both the Dow and S&P, Comstock has recently shifted its shorting focus to so-called Old Economy names, he said, declaring that the bear market "has just begun."

Currently, the Strategy fund is net 70% short, while the Capital Value fund is more than 100% net short.

The rub with guys like Minter is that he was a bear long before it was profitable to be so. For the past five years, the Strategy fund is down 5.74%, while the Capital Value fund is off 12.7%, according to Bloomberg. In the same time, the Dow and S&P 500 are each up more than 70%, while the Comp is up (still) more than 50%.

Minter makes a compelling argument -- particularly on the valuation side -- about why the bear will be far longer and more painful than most of us care to contemplate. But those long-term performance figures also speak volumes.



To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (123114)4/6/2001 12:20:49 AM
From: GST  Respond to of 164684
 
Sarmad: Companies will begin to trade on their fundamentals right about here -- but lots of the stocks that went up today have shakey or uncertain fundamentals -- telcom equipment providers for example where the carnage is not likely to end soon, nor is it clear what the competitive landscape will look like in a few years. As I have said before, you should buy stocks only if there is a clear reason for them to go up, and not because they were higher before. Companies like ARBA have very bad fundamentals -- i just don't want to own garbage. But in that sector there are others with great fundamentals -- manu and itwo for example. Today was a knee jerk "buy them all and cover shorts day" -- but the worst is not yet here for the stocks with weak fundamentals.