Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Idea Of The Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jerry Olson who wrote (38191)	4/6/2001 9:39:04 AM
From: Jerry Olson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50167

No longs here..heavy selling presure in the futures, tick and trin very negative...

To: Jerry Olson who wrote (38191)	4/6/2001 10:04:23 AM
From: IQBAL LATIF	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 50167

Higher unemployment, falling profits and falling wages is stagflation,not rising wages or stable wages and falling employment, the problem is the old economy text does not have terms to define a slow down from '30-40%' 'New economy growth rates' to reasonable '10%'. That is the crux of the matter. Remember last year the FED kept insisting seeing the 'strong numbers' that inflation is round the corner, whereas in Dec it dawned on them that it was lsow down not inflation the biggest threat, similarly this rise of income is imprtant in stagflation, we also have rising unemployment but falling wages, here the case is not the same. We are at a point where you may find that this whole new productivity led economy will lead to much higher volatility..