Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (135917)	4/7/2001 2:27:59 PM
From: Windsock	Respond to of 1572354

Jimbo - Did you hide those Florida ballots or was it the R's that control things in those counties with the missing ballots ?? nytimes.com Counties Can't Account for All Ballots Reported in 2000 By JOHN M. BRODER WASHINGTON, April 4 — The examination of disputed Florida presidential ballots reported today by The Miami Herald and USA Today demonstrated not only how difficult it is to count ballots with ambiguous markings. It also showed how hard it is to find the ballots that produced the Florida postelection chaos. In county after county, the number of ballots produced for the newspapers' examination of so-called undervotes, ballots on which no preference for president registered, failed to match the totals reported by those counties in the immediate aftermath of the election last November. In Orange County, for example, officials reported in November that they had found 966 ballots with no discernible vote for president. But when the newspapers went back to recount those undervotes, the county could only produce 639 such ballots. In Hillsborough County, the discrepancy was 137 votes; in Pinellas, 67.