SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mmmary who wrote (1328)4/6/2001 3:33:41 PM
From: Paul Kern  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 12465
 
If it's your real name, it's not an alias but the other makes sense if it's widely known.

Paul



To: mmmary who wrote (1328)4/6/2001 3:55:12 PM
From: Handshake™  Respond to of 12465
 
that is my stance, and though this thread ( and yes I do enjoy reading it) has brought out some very liberal far out cases, in the end the US Supreme Court will uphold the constitution, not some revamped Clintonite interpreation of it. The Clintonites judges will soon learn, HE's OUT OF OFFICE!



To: mmmary who wrote (1328)4/7/2001 12:40:05 PM
From: (No name provided)  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12465
 
If an alias has become what you are known as, such as several posters here, they can certainly show damage to their reputation in the online community. Certainly a grey area but I have spoken to several attorneys who believe a case could be made for defamation of an alias. I have no case law to provide you with but I bet you could find some where pennames were involved.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News