Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mark Fowler who wrote (123204)	4/7/2001 8:25:27 PM
From: GST	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

I don't disagree with much of that -- but I might take issue with this: "There is a complete loss of confidence in the Naz that has little to do with future prospects" I do not think it is clear what the fundamentals of the former "leaders" is going to be -- and there are going to be some buy and hold tech investors sitting in a dark corner with a bottle a year from now wondering why the hang over from the bubble just never seems to go away.

To: Mark Fowler who wrote (123204)	4/7/2001 8:35:02 PM
From: H James Morris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

Mark, who are the winners left on the new economy thread? They must be the ones who got out of the bubble at the end of 1999.

To: Mark Fowler who wrote (123204)	4/7/2001 8:43:29 PM
From: Victor Lazlo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

<<Gst, i believe market was clearly overpriced, but things are getting just as out of whack on the downside as they were on the upside. >> Mark there is no other destiny that could have been fulfilled. The extremes have to go both ways. They have to. It's Natural Law. The market will go irrationally lower still, since the market just kept going so irrationally higher, and higher still, in the 1999 - early 2000 timeframe.