SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (136001)4/7/2001 11:17:48 PM
From: pgerassi  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572447
 
Dear Scumbria:

Where have you been? In the clouds? Off planet? Sick?

There is a big difference between a covert operation and the current public state of affairs. What can be done in private is much more than will ever be acknowledged to the public at large. China made this into a public spectacle by demanding things it should not have. This matter could have been dealt with quickly and efficiently in private and China after getting private assurances (as long as they stay that way) could have let the crew and plane go free magnanamously, and so forth. But, now a different set of rules comes into play. These rules call for great deliberative actions, posturing, and all the things that cause great delays and international incidents. Any harm to the crew and the spew hits the fan, big time! Otherwise, we will have to wait it out as the process goes forward.

Spy business is private and this is not, anymore.

Pete



To: Scumbria who wrote (136001)4/8/2001 10:46:22 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572447
 
The plane may be called a "spy plane", but its mission is more accurately described as a recon mission not spying. It was crewed by uniformed personnel and it didn't operate behind enemy lines. This isn't "spy business". It wasn't a covert op.

Tim