Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : War -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (1011)	4/9/2001 4:33:41 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Respond to of 23908

I don't buy the politically correct version of WWII. Why? Several researchers agree on the fact that both Germany and the UK tacitly/secretely intended to carve up Europe in the 1930s --see the books The Chamberlain-Hitler Collusion and Hidden Agenda, the latter exposing Duke of Windsor's pro-Nazi feelings.... FIrst time I've heard this theory. As to the Duke: The Royals always eem to have at least one loose cannon among them. But Britain and France had a new mutual defense treaty with Poland; how does that square with this? On a broader scope, most observers/historians admit that Hitler considered the Anglo-Saxon empire (ie UK + USA) as a genuine, legitimate power I've read that before. Hitler would have let the Brits alone as long as Germany ruled over continental Europe. Historically, Britain has been allergic to the idea of a single power dominating the continent. They much prefer a multiparty balance, with them being one of the parties.