Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Real Man who wrote (67435)	4/9/2001 3:56:15 PM
From: marek_wojna	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116791

<<What we need is a new wind where producers just start delivering into their hedges. Then this NY practice will be doomed.>> Agreed. If the gold is to be only jewelry, not an investment, $200 is more than enough. I'm convinced that "You are your own worst enemy" fits most of the gold companies. Wonder if they realize that for people born after 1974 gold is really nothing more than necklace or ring. Another few years, maybe is too late already, and the companies who are now so proud to produce gold at $60/oz. will be same subject of shortselling what other producers with not so lucky deposits facing now. And I'll be the first one to do so.