SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: 5dave22 who wrote (35265)4/9/2001 12:54:16 PM
From: Joe NYCRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Dave,

Had AMD created any real demand for these products - the ASPs would certainly be higher than P4s.

I have a feeling that the demand has been very strong, but lately, there has been some deterioration. If AMD priced the Athlons higher than P4, the sales would be proportionally the same as P4 sales. That is 2 million P4s were sold, only about 340,000 Athlons would have been sold (maintaining market share what it is now). But AMD needs to increase market share, otherwise there will be unused capacity.

Regarding advertising, suppose AMD spend $70 million on advertising (wiping out almost all of the profit) Suppose it succeeded and ASPs increased by $10, basically paying for advertising, without spending all of the profit on it. The end result would be no effect on AMD, consumers $10 poorer, ad agency / media outlet $10 richer. I don't know if this is progress.

Joe



To: 5dave22 who wrote (35265)4/9/2001 2:35:12 PM
From: Jim McMannisRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
RE:"$150, $180, $220, $240 - they're all too low anyway, IMO, even in this market. Had AMD created any real demand for these products - the ASPs would certainly be higher than P4s."

In a slowing market, taking market share means dropping prices (AMD). Maintaining market share means dropping prices (Intel).

Jim