Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (10836)	4/9/2001 2:46:50 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

One of the problems is the dreadful ambiguity in the use of the term "peers" when talking about artificial "persons" such as states. First, they are really not persons, and cannot per se have a relationship. The people who comprise the actual rulers, bureaucrats, or whatever can have a relationship mediated through the organizations. Second, states are not, in fact, all created equal. We have to reconcile personal autonomy with the legitimacy of government. We recognize consent of the governed as the principle of legitimacy in this age, as formally demonstrated through a constitution and free elections. Any government that does not rest on that foundation is rightly viewed with suspicion. If, in addition, the government behaves with particular oppressiveness towards its citizens, then it is a tyranny simply. Pragmatically we have agreed to treat the "government on the ground" as legitimate, but that does not mean we can or should, ultimately, regard it as a peer.