SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (91855)4/9/2001 3:20:55 PM
From: oldirtybastard  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 436258
 
I'm not sure about the plane crash details except that I'm 100% sure both sides are lying to some extent, probably the Chinese more so but anyone in their position should do the same. btw you are famous skeeter -g-

Same sentiment from SkeeterBug over on Silicon Investor: "This release was Amazon's sales pitch to the barefoot, crayon carrying people. What they didn't mention was the interest on the debt that they have to pay, i.e., included in the profit number - not that pro forma crap. Interest money is *real* and must be paid."

aolpf5.marketwatch.com{FD0E0060-CE98-46E6-B2F7-5C1BA0C89F73}



To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (91855)4/9/2001 3:55:44 PM
From: Horgad  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
I don't think it lost its nose in the collision. It had damage to a wing and engine. Although I did see a picture of the plane with its nose missing, I would swear that I saw one earlier with the nose intact. So, I assumed it was because the nose houses electronic sensors and the Chinese are taking it apart.

washingtonpost.com


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News