SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Network Appliance -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: riposte who wrote (7666)4/10/2001 9:02:52 PM
From: kas1  Respond to of 10934
 
re DW "giving us a warning," I think that everyone knows that there's some lowering of expectations. What we don't know is how much -- but I wouldn't equate his statement with a warning.

BTW, Dan W's economics error: what he should have said is that the demand used to be inelastic (with respect to price), and is now elastic. Elastic demand means* "as the price goes up, I buy less of if." He said the opposite.

*Yes, I know this is a simplified definition.



To: riposte who wrote (7666)4/10/2001 9:20:46 PM
From: DownSouth  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10934
 
NetApp has historically positioned themselves as being a much lower cost alternative to EMC - i.e, companies have ALWAYS been concerned with cost of ownership.

Nope. The whole TCO thing has just recently gotten wings with that independent report that showed NTAP was 70% less TCO than EMC. NTAP has always claimed that but had no hard independent data to back it up. NTAP's marketing has been about lower initial cost/MB, ease of use, and performance. What DW is telling us is that the TCO thing has traction in the market for a change.

Personally, I think he's giving us a warning.

DW is pretty straight ahead in his talking style. That was NO warning. That was a marketing/sales statement that should not be interpreted except "we are whipping EMC's ass in the market." Now whether that means NTAP is on target is another matter.