Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : BEA Systems (BEAS) - Undiscovered Growth Stock -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Susan G who wrote (1779)	4/11/2001 2:06:05 AM
From: Spytrdr	Respond to of 2477

what are you talking about? i haven't changed any messages, you cannot change any message ex post facto, nor would i want to either. S.I. admins did delete though lml's very violent, obscene, weird and vulgar message, and later deleted my response to it where i ended with "see you at $ 10". the guy needs to calm down. this was an excellent call and trade (65 to 20). you got your bounce too (20 to 35), pretty euphoric, congrats. so we are all happy now. that doesn't mean the worst is over for this stock, not by a long shot. if you want me to repeat that 'reference', i'll say it again without blushing, you'll see this stock at $ 10, eventually and inevitably, without any splits involved. if that sounds like a yahoo scare tactic to you so be it. i've already posted some charts briefly explaining why. we can argue endlessly about the trading opportunities both short and long in between each successive lower high, but there's a clear trend of lower highs here that's undeniable. these ridiculous spikes, with charts filled with gaps, are not a solid foundation for any sustainable rally.

To: Susan G who wrote (1779)	4/11/2001 9:49:32 AM
From: Mama Bear	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2477

"Rubbing it in the faces of the longs on a down day is as low as someone can get on SI. Of course, you have no comment on a long 'rubbing it in the face of a short on an up day'. Regards, Barb

To: Susan G who wrote (1779)	4/11/2001 12:21:26 PM
From: lml	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 2477

Thank you, Susan, for your comments in my support. I knew what I read. In light of the initial rude comments made to me, and to the longs on this thread, I found Spy's quick about-face demonstrative of the lack of credibility that should be assigned these types of posters. I used to like SI very much because you could find some very good discussions here, mostly on fundamentals, but if you preferred the technicals, good discussions could also be found here. Raging Bull started out as a very good community, but quickly went down hill quickly. There, many nubiles with no career other than to sit in front of PC screen all day trade their measely $5-10K accounts, flooded the boards and filled them up useless chatter. I thought SI was immune from this as they now charge of fee. But it looks like SI, too, has gone down hill. Unfortunate. Mama Bear is testimony to this conclusive fact. At first I thought she was an SI rep. But now I'm convinced she's too brain-dead, and too personal & argumentative with her communications to be one. She's has nothing to offer here other than to incite the bickering that most wish would cease. I, for one, will move on. I got work to do. Regards, lml