SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Home on the range where the buffalo roam -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: T L Comiskey who wrote (12537)4/11/2001 9:52:02 AM
From: T L Comiskey  Respond to of 13572
 
AG...an AH...???
Maybe yes...maybe no

Greenspan blamed for bubble

Fed chairman encouraged 'irrational exuberance' among
investors

Charlotte Denny
Tuesday April 10, 2001
The Guardian

The fond belief that Alan Greenspan, venerable chairman of the US Federal Reserve
Board, is a superman who can prevent a crash inflated American stocks to twice
their fair value last year, economic researchers are warning.

Although US stocks have lost $4 trillion since the height of the Greenspan "bubble"
last March, the market is still overvalued by $3.5 trillion, according to Professor
Marcus Miller of Warwick University and his colleagues.

"There will be a market crash when investors realise that Mr Greenspan is not
superhuman," he will tell his colleagues at the Royal Economic Society's annual
conference in Durham today.

Prof Miller said US investors ignored the risks and piled into stocks because they
believed that Mr Greenspan would bail out the market if it nosedived - precisely the
kind of "irrational exuberance" which the Fed chairman warned against in a
landmark speech four years ago.

Despite his warning, Mr Greenspan encouraged the exuberance, according to Prof
Miller, because he failed to take a tough line after his speech. Mr Greenspan cut
interest rates twice in the space of six weeks during the Russian debt default crisis in
autumn 1998, which led investors to believe that he would always act to prevent
sharp falls in share prices.

Exaggerated faith in Mr Greenspan caused investors to discount the risks of
investing in shares and sent the market soaring. Prof Miller estimates that the wider
measure of US shares, the S&P 500 index, which has fallen by 400 points from its
high of 1500 last March, needs to lose a further 350 points.

Such a fall would bring it back to the level it stood at in December 1996, when Mr
Greenspan made that speech. According to Prof Miller, four years of subsequent
economic growth means that this is now a fair value for the US market.

Prof Miller's paper has been discussed by senior central bankers on both sides of
the Atlantic. The Bank of England has held a seminar on the paper and the Fed
asked for a copy of the preliminary version a year ago.

A further crash is not inevitable, if the Fed chairman could gradually bring investors
to their senses.

"Mr Greenspan would confirm his status as a great central banker if he can do it,"
said Prof Miller.