To: jttmab who wrote (2410 ) 4/11/2001 12:04:30 PM From: Neocon Respond to of 93284 I am Eurocentric, although I consider the Pacific Basin an area of increasing urgency, and one cannot ignore the Middle East. The most immediate problem is securing the future of Central and Eastern Europe, and incorporating them into pan- European structures as they become eligible. The Muslim Republics of the former Soviet Union, particularly Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, and Uzbekistan, are also important strategically. Not only is Caspian oil the probable "new Middle East", but there are still nukes and large Russian minorities in these areas. The future of the Pacific Basin largely depends on the future of China. Will it become more aggressive, or will it play a more constructive regional role as an emerging economic power? Taiwan is key to the future, for if the Chinese make a military play there, the future is one of regional containment and strained relations. Technology accelerates the interest in global policies, but trade is still the primary engine of engagement. The national interest is not the transient sentiments of the populace revealed in polls, it is always a matter of historical engagement based on common values and persistent commercial and strategic interests. Leadership is crucial. We are limited in the ability to educate the broad populace. There is inevitable simplification. I agree, sometimes it is distasteful and wrong- headed, but sometimes, I think it is pretty straightforward. Remember, I thought Reagan right to call the Soviet Union and "Evil Empire". Very refreshing, for one of the most odious regimes of the century. I am busy sending my wife off on business, so I cannot settle yet. I am glad to have some time for productive discussion, though. Thanks.......