Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tim Luke who wrote (138)	4/12/2001 1:12:10 PM
From: Augustus Gloop	Respond to of 1100

I agree TL.

To: Tim Luke who wrote (138)	4/12/2001 1:31:37 PM
From: Neenny	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1100

Tim, I have only been here for 3 years, surely not as long as you veterans to the site. But in spite of my shorter tenure, I do know what a great place SI was. In that time I have also witnessed the questionable things that have happened. I have read your stuff and your accusations all over the place. I have seen the back stabbing (not pointing to anyone particularly with that comment.....)it has just not been a pretty site. Much too much blood in the streets. I do find it unfortunate that those same battles will be and have been carried over to Ihub. Comparable to a bunch of vultures hunting their prey. Not that I expect the people to change sites and be ever so kind to each other simply because the .com address changed. But the issues should be left at the door. The new people to Ihub or investing don't need to be tainted by the fights and accusations that started here. I know, I know you are going to argue that these are fights that involve market issues and there for should not be ignored. I say.....let the courts prove it, and if a person is not willing to go that far with their accusations.....then they should be quiet about it, lest they teeter on the verge of libel. Part of my view on this is..."Unless a person is part of the solution to a problem, they should not be come part of the problem" I guess that reflects my views on why the BS from SI should remain at SI and not be brought on to the boards of IHub. The non-SI people at Ihub are not going to be part of the solution to these problems, so they should not be drawn into it over there. (And yes, that would go for me as well, keep in mind, I am only replying to a message you sent me.) If people dislike each other then they should be big enough to move on with their lives and ignore those who they feel they have irreconcilable differences with. Issues that are SEC or court related should be dealt with in their specific venues, not but bickering back and forth on message boards. The continued bickering severs no purpose, but to make the posters look childish. Of course this is all just my 2 cents worth~~~