Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GraceZ who wrote (93729)	4/12/2001 7:30:37 PM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™	Respond to of 436258

LOL!!! so true. I would love to hear what he's saying btw. but he hasn't said anything yet. perhaps the questions were too polite. doesn't matter I suppose. the overcompensation part I did think was somewhat revealing though not an absolutely quantifiable indicator. but I hope he's right actually. much easier to play this game upward and onward than downward and lower. different herd. but i do think there's an obligation willingly undertaken or imposed by us, not to defend a position, but at least to get beyond generalities particularly when the position is 100% invested and long with a captal L. a deja vu issue visited only a few weeks ago in this rapidly passing year. and...more to the point... in order to avoid any element of hypocrisy in the oft touted, though not formerly stated, SOP here: we're not bears per se, or bulls. we're fundamentalists with a bit of chart chasing thrown in (actually more than a bit, right Allan?)... so i'm for a conversational exchange of views, not a drop in visit from the holy of holy-er than thou's. Otherwise, what's the point of the visit in the first place.