Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (138379)	4/14/2001 5:48:10 PM
From: zonkie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

>>>>I don't use the word private,<<< You used the words "limited access", to me if an area has limited access saying it is private is not wrong. ___________ >>>>or view and I make no suggestion that anyone should be allowed to view pornography.<<< You used the words "my solution is" and then you mentioned the "limited access area", your post was to Cummings who has made a post about children seeing porn in a public library. That sounds to me like you would be happy if a library had private areas for viewing porn. ________ >>>> When you first tried to justify your lie you only partially took the entire post.<<< I' not copying your whole post now and the reason is the same as it always is when someone pastes only a part of a message. Not all parts are important to the answer. ________ The way I read your post is that it not only was a way to help protect children but also a way to provide a place for people who wanted to view porn in a public library could do that. You are attaching much more importance to this than it deserves. I know you have problems expressing yourself but when you write something you have no right to get mad if people don't interpret a post the way you want them to. _______ Now I have a question for you. Did you go back and change a post after I had made a reply to it?

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (138379)	4/16/2001 9:47:47 AM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

Hi Thomas Watson, This is a very nice post of your's from Feb 14, 2001: "I don't call individuals idiotic, retarded, ninnyhammer or scum." Message 15354865 In contrast, here are some posts of your's from April 14, 2001: "I think you are a liar and just plain scum" Message 15662998 "I consider zonkie a liar and a stupid liar." Message 15663410 "Retard, here are the facts." Message 15663479 "J_F, you are a retard " Message 15663885 "J_F only an asshole " siliconinvestor.com On April 14, you broke all of these TOU points: a) Using the Service for illegal purposes or for the transmission of material that is unlawful, harassing, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, abusive, threatening, harmful, vulgar, obscene, tortuous or otherwise objectionable. b) Posting material, non-public information about companies, without the authorization to do so. (You spam your personal and business sites constantly) c) Posting or transmitting third party copyrighted information or in any way infringing on the intellectual property rights, contractual or fiduciary rights of others. e) Using the Service for the transmission of junk mail, spam, chain letters, or unsolicited mass distribution of e-mail. f) Using the Service for the transmission of advertising or promotion of any product or service. g) Posting improper or off-topic messages or posting more than twenty messages in six hours. h) Violating the letter or spirit of the Terms of Use. It appears that your right-wing persuasions make you immune to discipline on SI, no matter how much you misbehave. Scumbria