Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (132359)	4/14/2001 9:52:11 PM
From: greg s	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Detour Dan, re: Re: But ain't nobody seein' 'em !!! [Palamino] Your reply to Paul's post was a diatribe, but didn't endeavor to address the topic: Where are those mobile Athlons that we first heard about when we were at Computex years ago? And where is this famous Palomino core that is going to knock the socks off anything Chipzilla pushes out the door? The mobile Athlons, as we reported in Another Place some months ago, were facing difficult build problems and the ODMs (that is, the Taiwanese manufacturers who make the faceless notebooks which later get the logos) also had some difficulties, particularly with heat dissipation and chassis. Still, when we asked AMD this question only a month or so ago, we were under the definite impression that pretty soon we'd see some units with mobile Athlons in 'em. We haven't seen any... Dear readers, have you?

To: Dan3 who wrote (132359)	4/14/2001 10:48:04 PM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Blow Hard Dan - Re: "Just dumb luck that Intel blew it with both P4 and Itanic. Who would have expected that not one, but two, huge Intel development efforts would both be such disappointments?" Intel's Pentium 4 is outselling AMD's non-existent PaloMeatHead by a WIDE MARGIN. As for Intel's ITanium - why does AMD now list the END of 2002 for their 64 bit CPU poroduction? Paul