Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: joseph krinsky who wrote (506)	4/15/2001 12:30:40 AM
From: zonkie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1100

I didn't say it was important. I don't think any of it is important but I haven't read much of this thread. Tell me why you think the other parts of the document are important?

To: joseph krinsky who wrote (506)	4/15/2001 12:32:09 AM
From: Augustus Gloop	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1100

Why do you continue? He answered your question. Does it not seem logical to move on?

To: joseph krinsky who wrote (506)	4/15/2001 1:03:26 AM
From: Neenny	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1100

Ya know Joseph, given your track record here on this board so far...If the address would have been deleted, you would have gone off on why the address was deleted. You mostly would have then inserted all kinds of suspicions as to why the address wasn't there. Why should the address been deleted. You as a question regarding the registration of a cooperation. Part of the publicly available information about that cooperation is it's address. It is not like it is a secret. Anyone that really wanted to know could have found out. So again I ask..."Why delete it???"