Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neenny who wrote (529)	4/15/2001 1:50:08 AM
From: joseph krinsky	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1100

it's so nice of you to put words in my post that weren't there. I didn't realize my post didn't have enough already. {you also questioned if they are paying the state as they should be...They must be somewhere, if they are paying salaries don't they have to pay the state something somewhere along the line? Message 15663953} I never said "as they should be", implying they weren't, I asked if they were somewhere since somewhere along the line they have to pay the state something. since I understood carolyn's post the way I understood it, and not the way you wanted me to understand it, it only made sense to me to ask the question the way I did. If they weren't in florida then they must be somewhere. they're not just a figment of your imagination. I didn't imply that they were nonexistant, I merely asked a one sentence question.then zonkie came along and found them in florida. he answered it. To:Carolyn who wrote (493) From: joseph krinsky Saturday, Apr 14, 2001 10:21 PM View Replies (2) \| Respond to of 533 Did you find investorshub listed there? Message 15663753

To: Neenny who wrote (529)	4/15/2001 2:00:35 AM
From: Neenny	Respond to of 1100

Edit to this post... These are my words..."Take note, she never said that is what she thinks or believes but merely offered it up as a possible explanation for your inferring that Ihub was not registered as a cooperation.....you also questioned if they are paying the state as they should be.." I thought by using the italics as is often done on this site, it would separate my words from the quote in Joseph's post. These again italicized words are his, They must be somewhere, if they are paying salaries don't they have to pay the state something somewhere along the line? He must not have remembered how often the italics are used to differentiate between who said what on this site. As he had not posted much for a while before this ......hope this clears it up!!