Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dayuhan who wrote (11477)	4/18/2001 12:53:45 AM
From: Greg or e	Respond to of 82486

Evening Steve. Frankly I'm inclined to agree with C.H. on this one as well. I don't believe you are serious, or else your in denial. It seems to me that you are in the same boat that David Hume found himself in, because his verification principal itself was not able to meet the test of being mathematically or empirically verified. This seems to be the same level of Proof that you are demanding. "Good and evil, like God, exist because we created them. We will have to measure them according to criteria we create; what other criteria are we going to find?" You can't prove that, now can you? Aren't you speaking nonsense? By tying the concept of good and evil together with God's existence, you are forced to conclude that good and evil have no more validity than God. They don't exist!! Yet you continue to live life, (I'm fairly sure) as if they do. Not very logical. It seems you have a little problem there Steve. "Logic does not show that these "laws" are universal. If anything, it shows the opposite." Which logic are we using today? Is this your own unique brand? Of course if you start with a false premiss your conclusion will also be false. Nonetheless, please demonstrate logically, why it is that these "laws" of logic are non universal. I won't hold my breath either. Greg