SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Stock Farmer who wrote (51450)4/16/2001 11:19:17 AM
From: Dave  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 77399
 
John,

Basicly by growing inventory 1.6 B$ they DECREASED COGS by 1.6 B$. So Net Income was overstated (with respect to actual cash into the business) by 1.6 B$.

All this math, must digest. Ok, I assume that Cisco is FIFO, correct?

If so, let me expand and u tell me whether i'm right or wrong. By Cisco expanding inventory, most likely the cost of purchasing that "stuff" (for lack of a better word) was higher. Thus, it will cause Cisco's CGS to increase (assuming they sell the same amount of "stuff"), this Q. Due to the downturn, I guess we should assume that ASP will go or flat. Therefore, with the rise of higher cost "stuff" last Q, that translates into a higher CGS?

Am I on the rigth path? Thus NI will be lower this Q, however, OCF will improve due to the decrease in inventory.

I understand that AR needs to be watched, but why the "tax benefit for stock option"

Thanks,

dave



To: Stock Farmer who wrote (51450)4/16/2001 11:21:36 AM
From: GVTucker  Respond to of 77399
 
John, my biggest problem with PEG is that I have yet to see anyone who could calculate a 5 year forward growth rate with even a remote bit of accuracy. That piece of data is essential to the ratio, it is a piece of data that almost every analyst calculates, and yet it is 100% fiction.