SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The Duke of URLĀ© who wrote (132606)4/17/2001 1:43:22 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
RE:"Yeah. Number one, its spelt "argument" :))"

Thank you very much, I've been wundering about that for years.

RE:"2. I think he is comparing the 486 which ran at 66 and the Pentium 90 when it first came out. The 90 WAS slower, but about 6 months after its release you began to see software released with a minimum requirement of "Pentium"

The P90 was slower than a 486-66? Sure you're not refering to the Pentium 60/66 which would be a better analogy since they were on a larger process.
Besides that, I like the P-Pro-P4 analogy better.

RE:"IV. And for your big point, that P4 takes away sales from
P3. That is such a sophisticated observation, I don't think Fin knows where to begin"

I know, keep it broad and confuse 'em. LOL

Jim



To: The Duke of URLĀ© who wrote (132606)4/17/2001 2:05:57 PM
From: andreas_wonisch  Respond to of 186894
 
Duke, Re: I think he is comparing the 486 which ran at 66 and the Pentium 90 when it first came out. The 90 WAS slower

I think your confused a few things here (probably with the Pentium Pro). The fasted 486 at the Pentium launch run at 66 Mhz (i486DX2). After the Pentium 60 came out, Intel released an i486DX4/100 which was actually faster in most applications since it had 16kb L1 cache (compared to 8kb with the DX2). Later Intel released the Pentium 90 which ran circles around the DX4.

Bottom line: The Pentium was always faster clock-to-clock than the 486 (even the beefed up DX4 version).

Andreas