Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AK2004 who wrote (132644)	4/17/2001 3:53:17 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Albert, re: "much less but so much more effective" Denial is wonderful. John

To: AK2004 who wrote (132644)	4/17/2001 5:52:38 PM
From: SisterMaryElephant	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Albert, <ps was not I accused of lying when i suggested few months back that there is no way intel can spend 7.5B? Whom you are going to believe me or Barrett, after all? > You were not lying, you were wrong. SK

To: AK2004 who wrote (132644)	4/17/2001 10:03:36 PM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Maad Albert - Re: "ps was not I accused of lying when i suggested few months back that there is no way intel can spend 7.5B? Whom you are going to believe me or Barrett, after all? " We believe Barrett - since he says so. biz.yahoo.com Capital spending for 2001 is expected to be approximately $7.5 billion. The company will use its financial strength to invest in key areas such as 0.13-micron process technology, which will enable the company to cost-effectively produce leading-edge microprocessors beginning later this year, and 300 mm process technology, which is expected to lead to approximately 30 percent microprocessor die cost-per-unit reductions in 2002 and beyond. Thanks for showing us all - AGAIN - what a complete FOOL you are. reagrds - Dash pAUL